Skip to main
+ Add a resource

Evidence papers and journal articles

A black cat sits on top of a pile of papers and folders on a window sill

Filters

Search list
Clear all
Sources
Clear
Authors
Clear
No items found.
Year published
Clear
Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Anne‐Marie Boylan
Anne‐Marie Boylan
Helen Snooks
Helen Snooks
Hitomi Yokota
Hitomi Yokota
Manor Gardens Community Centre
Manor Gardens Community Centre
Nicola Kayes
Nicola Kayes
North Central London Commissioning Support Unit (NEL CSU)
North Central London Commissioning Support Unit (NEL CSU)
Sarah O'Brien
Sarah O'Brien
Abdul Ghaffar
Abdul Ghaffar
Adalbert Evers
Adalbert Evers
Adele Horobin, George Brown, Fred Higton, Stevie Vanhegan, Andrew Wragg, Paula Wray & Dawn-Marie Walker
Adele Horobin, George Brown, Fred Higton, Stevie Vanhegan, Andrew Wragg, Paula Wray & Dawn-Marie Walker
Akala
Akala
Aksel Ersoy
Aksel Ersoy
Albert Norström, Chris Cvitanovic, Marie F. Löf, Simon West, Carina Wyborn
Albert Norström, Chris Cvitanovic, Marie F. Löf, Simon West, Carina Wyborn
Alicia Renedo
Alicia Renedo
Alison O’Shea
Alison O’Shea
Alison Porter
Alison Porter
Allison Metz
Allison Metz
Alyce-Ellen Barber
Alyce-Ellen Barber
Amy Barnes
Amy Barnes
Andrew M. Ibrahim
Andrew M. Ibrahim
Andrew C Grundy
Andrew C Grundy
Andrew C. Grundy
Andrew C. Grundy
Andrew Lemmy
Andrew Lemmy
Andrew Perry
Andrew Perry
Andy Gibson
Andy Gibson
Aneela McAvoy
Aneela McAvoy
Aneela McAvoy
Aneela McAvoy
Angela Filipe
Angela Filipe
Angelina Osborne
Angelina Osborne
Annalise Ayre
Annalise Ayre
Anne Rathbone, Sunita Pallan-Jhalli, Hansa Clay, Raymond Codner, Tara Bourne, Samantha Gregory, Francesca Turner and Emerson Morris
Anne Rathbone, Sunita Pallan-Jhalli, Hansa Clay, Raymond Codner, Tara Bourne, Samantha Gregory, Francesca Turner and Emerson Morris
Annegret Dahlmann-Noor
Annegret Dahlmann-Noor
Annette Boaz
Annette Boaz
Anthony X
Anthony X
April Smith
April Smith
Arun Verma
Arun Verma
Ashely Campbell
Ashely Campbell
Asher Wood
Asher Wood
Assad Hafeez
Assad Hafeez
Authentistic Research Collective
Authentistic Research Collective
Azar Richardson
Azar Richardson
Ben Robinson
Ben Robinson
Benjamin Ewert
Benjamin Ewert
Benjamin JR Buckley
Benjamin JR Buckley
Berni Graham
Berni Graham
Beth Hall
Beth Hall
Beth Perry
Beth Perry
Bev J Holmes, Allan Best, Huw Davies, David Hunter, Michael P Kelly, Martin Marshall, Joanne Rycroft-Malone
Bev J Holmes, Allan Best, Huw Davies, David Hunter, Michael P Kelly, Martin Marshall, Joanne Rycroft-Malone
Bram Verschuere
Bram Verschuere
Brendan Warner-Southwell
Brendan Warner-Southwell
Brian Noonan
Brian Noonan
Bridie Angela Evans
Bridie Angela Evans
C Wyborn
C Wyborn
Caitlin McMullin
Caitlin McMullin
Caitlin Wake
Caitlin Wake
Candida Lowell-Smith
Candida Lowell-Smith
Carmel McGrath
Carmel McGrath
Carmen Vargas
Carmen Vargas
Caroline Afolabi
Caroline Afolabi
Cassandra Yuill
Cassandra Yuill
Cassia Bennett
Cassia Bennett
Cat Duncan-Rees
Cat Duncan-Rees
Catherine Durose
Catherine Durose
Catherine Hamilton-Giachritsis
Catherine Hamilton-Giachritsis
Catherine Mangan
Catherine Mangan
Catherine Needham
Catherine Needham
Catherine Pope
Catherine Pope
Catherine Wilton
Catherine Wilton
Cathy Pharoah
Cathy Pharoah
Charity Binka
Charity Binka
Charlotte Sharp
Charlotte Sharp
Chloe Gill
Chloe Gill
Chloe Grindey
Chloe Grindey
Chloe Grindey
Chloe Grindey
Chris Dayson
Chris Dayson
Chris Hewitt
Chris Hewitt
Christopher Burton
Christopher Burton
Cicely A Marston
Cicely A Marston
Claire Armitage
Claire Armitage
Claire Craig
Claire Craig
Co-creating Welfare
Co-creating Welfare
Co-production Collective
Co-production Collective
Co-production Wales
Co-production Wales
Colin King
Colin King
Crawford, S. Y.
Crawford, S. Y.
Cui A. S.
Cui A. S.
Darren Bagnall
Darren Bagnall
Dave Vanderhoven
Dave Vanderhoven
David Beran et al
David Beran et al
David Boyle
David Boyle
David Budtz Pedersen
David Budtz Pedersen
David Dean
David Dean
David M Bell
David M Bell
David Milledge
David Milledge
David Olusoga
David Olusoga
Debra de Silva
Debra de Silva
Deena Hayes-Greene
Deena Hayes-Greene
Doreen Tembo
Doreen Tembo
Dorota Ali
Dorota Ali
Dorota Chapko
Dorota Chapko
Durham Community Research Team
Durham Community Research Team
E. Kay M. Tisdall
E. Kay M. Tisdall
Eleri McFarlane-Rose
Eleri McFarlane-Rose
Elinor Ostrom
Elinor Ostrom
Elke Loeffler
Elke Loeffler
Ellen Bennett
Ellen Bennett
Ellen Thaels
Ellen Thaels
Ellie Brooks-Hall
Ellie Brooks-Hall
Eloise Stark
Eloise Stark
Emeline Han
Emeline Han
Emer Brangan
Emer Brangan
Emma Ward
Emma Ward
Epiphany Kidd
Epiphany Kidd
Erna Snelgrove-Clarke
Erna Snelgrove-Clarke
Esmée Hanna
Esmée Hanna
Ewan Ferlie
Ewan Ferlie
F. V. Hallam-Bowles
F. V. Hallam-Bowles
Fadi El-Jardali
Fadi El-Jardali
Fiona Godlee
Fiona Godlee
Firoza Davies
Firoza Davies
Franchesca Ramsey
Franchesca Ramsey
Frank Reilly
Frank Reilly
Gabriel M Leung
Gabriel M Leung
Gary Hickey
Gary Hickey
Gemma Wheeler
Gemma Wheeler
Geo Whitman
Geo Whitman
Gerry McGivern
Gerry McGivern
Gillian Chan
Gillian Chan
Glenn Robert
Glenn Robert
Graham P. Martin
Graham P. Martin
Grant O'Brien
Grant O'Brien
Gy Larsen
Gy Larsen
Heather Campbell
Heather Campbell
Heidi Andrews
Heidi Andrews
Helen Craig
Helen Craig
Helen Sharp
Helen Sharp
Helen Smith
Helen Smith
Helen Smith
Helen Smith
Helen Thomas-Hughes
Helen Thomas-Hughes
Hemakumar Devan
Hemakumar Devan
Husseina Hamza
Husseina Hamza
Huw T.O. Davies
Huw T.O. Davies
Ian Gwilt
Ian Gwilt
Ilina Singh
Ilina Singh
Imperial College London Institute of Global Health Innovation
Imperial College London Institute of Global Health Innovation
Ingrid Abreu Scherer
Ingrid Abreu Scherer
Irene Akua Agyepong
Irene Akua Agyepong
Iris Lavi
Iris Lavi
Isaac Samuels
Isaac Samuels
Isabel Hague
Isabel Hague
Isabel Hague
Isabel Hague
Isabel Wilkerson
Isabel Wilkerson
Issiaka Sombie
Issiaka Sombie
JM Chambers
JM Chambers
Jacqueline Miller
Jacqueline Miller
Jacqueline Newton
Jacqueline Newton
Jacqui Lovell
Jacqui Lovell
Jade Davies
Jade Davies
James Nicholls
James Nicholls
James Paskins
James Paskins
James Rees
James Rees
Jane Bruton
Jane Bruton
Jane O’Hara
Jane O’Hara
Janet Harris
Janet Harris
Janet Heaton
Janet Heaton
Jarg Bergold
Jarg Bergold
Jasmine Noor
Jasmine Noor
Jayshree Adnath
Jayshree Adnath
Jenelle Clarke
Jenelle Clarke
Jennifer Kate Cooney
Jennifer Kate Cooney
Jennifer Oates
Jennifer Oates
Jenny Barke
Jenny Barke
Jenny Harrow
Jenny Harrow
Jenny Hasenfuss
Jenny Hasenfuss
Jeremy Cripps
Jeremy Cripps
Jo Armes
Jo Armes
Jo Cairns
Jo Cairns
Jo Day
Jo Day
Joe Langley
Joe Langley
Joe Langley
Joe Langley
Johanna Hanefeld
Johanna Hanefeld
John Amaechi
John Amaechi
John Gallangers
John Gallangers
Jon Gutierrez
Jon Gutierrez
Jonas Grønvad
Jonas Grønvad
Jonas Stier
Jonas Stier
Joseph Langley
Joseph Langley
Josephine Chambers
Josephine Chambers
Josephine Ocloo
Josephine Ocloo
Josie Vallely
Josie Vallely
Joyce Fox
Joyce Fox
Julia Hiscock
Julia Hiscock
Julia Slay
Julia Slay
Julia Unwin
Julia Unwin
Julie E Reed
Julie E Reed
Julie Wright
Julie Wright
Justin Waring
Justin Waring
K. R. Robinson
K. R. Robinson
Karen Laing
Karen Laing
Karina Lovell
Karina Lovell
Karina Lovell
Karina Lovell
Karine Levasseur
Karine Levasseur
Kate Pahl
Kate Pahl
Kate Pieroudis
Kate Pieroudis
Kathleen Lovell
Kathleen Lovell
Kathryn Perera
Kathryn Perera
Kati Turner
Kati Turner
Katie Marovitch
Katie Marovitch
Keith Marais
Keith Marais
Keitumetse-Kabelo Murray
Keitumetse-Kabelo Murray
Kelsey Blackwell
Kelsey Blackwell
Kennedy Woods Architecture
Kennedy Woods Architecture
Kingsley Norton
Kingsley Norton
Kylee Trevillion
Kylee Trevillion
Lars Tummers
Lars Tummers
Lauren Walker
Lauren Walker
Leask, C.F., Sandlund, M., Skelton, D.A. et al.
Leask, C.F., Sandlund, M., Skelton, D.A. et al.
Leigh Hale
Leigh Hale
Lindsay H. Dewa
Lindsay H. Dewa
Lindsey K. Horner
Lindsey K. Horner
Lisa Hinton
Lisa Hinton
Liz Richardson
Liz Richardson
Lois Beech, Margaret Edwards, Clare Skidmore, Pete Fleischmann, Jeremy Porteus
Lois Beech, Margaret Edwards, Clare Skidmore, Pete Fleischmann, Jeremy Porteus
Louca-Mai Brady
Louca-Mai Brady
Louise Archer
Louise Archer
Louise Locock
Louise Locock
Louise Whitehead
Louise Whitehead
Lucia Rocca-Ihenacho
Lucia Rocca-Ihenacho
Lucy Pollyanna Goldsmith, Rosaleen Morshead, Charlotte McWilliam, Gordon Forbes, Michael Ussher, Alan Simpson, Mike Lucock and Steve Gillard
Lucy Pollyanna Goldsmith, Rosaleen Morshead, Charlotte McWilliam, Gordon Forbes, Michael Ussher, Alan Simpson, Mike Lucock and Steve Gillard
Luke Budworth
Luke Budworth
Luke Budworth
Luke Budworth
Lyn Williams
Lyn Williams
Lynn Laidlaw
Lynn Laidlaw
Lynn Laidlaw
Lynn Laidlaw
Lynn Laidlaw
Lynn Laidlaw
Lynne Williams
Lynne Williams
ME Ryan et al.
ME Ryan et al.
Maarten Kok
Maarten Kok
Mari-Rose Kennedy
Mari-Rose Kennedy
Marie Louise Jørgensen
Marie Louise Jørgensen
Marie-Gloriose Ingabire
Marie-Gloriose Ingabire
Marilyn Howard
Marilyn Howard
Mark Bevir
Mark Bevir
Mark Dalgarno
Mark Dalgarno
Mark Shucksmith
Mark Shucksmith
Mark Williams
Mark Williams
Marlies Honingh
Marlies Honingh
Maternity Voices Matter
Maternity Voices Matter
Maurice Smith
Maurice Smith
Meerat Kaur
Meerat Kaur
Melissa Bradshaw
Melissa Bradshaw
Meredith A. Perry
Meredith A. Perry
Michael Clark
Michael Clark
Michael Harris
Michael Harris
Michael Turner
Michael Turner
Michelle Farr
Michelle Farr
Michelle Lokot
Michelle Lokot
Michelle Man
Michelle Man
Mike Trapp
Mike Trapp
Morwenna Foden
Morwenna Foden
Mostafa Yaghoubi
Mostafa Yaghoubi
Muna Abdi
Muna Abdi
Nadia Bashir
Nadia Bashir
Nakata C.
Nakata C.
Naomi Schneider
Naomi Schneider
Natalie Hamer
Natalie Hamer
Natalie Hamer
Natalie Hamer
Natalie Morris
Natalie Morris
Nathan Davies, Jenny Hopwood, Nina Walker, Jamie Ross, Steve Iliffe, Kate Walters & Greta Rait
Nathan Davies, Jenny Hopwood, Nina Walker, Jamie Ross, Steve Iliffe, Kate Walters & Greta Rait
National Co-production Advisory Group (NCAG)
National Co-production Advisory Group (NCAG)
Nazihah Uddin
Nazihah Uddin
Nefyn Williams
Nefyn Williams
Neil Small
Neil Small
NeurOX YPAG
NeurOX YPAG
New Economics Foundation
New Economics Foundation
Niccola Hutchinson-Pascal
Niccola Hutchinson-Pascal
Nick Hewlett
Nick Hewlett
Nick Holmes
Nick Holmes
Nicklas Bang Bådum
Nicklas Bang Bådum
Nicky Britten
Nicky Britten
Noreen Blanluet
Noreen Blanluet
Oli Williams
Oli Williams
Oli Williams, Sophie Sarre, Stan Constantina Papoulias, Sarah Knowles, Glenn Robert, Peter Beresford, Diana Rose, Sarah Carr, Meerat Kaur & Victoria J. Palmer
Oli Williams, Sophie Sarre, Stan Constantina Papoulias, Sarah Knowles, Glenn Robert, Peter Beresford, Diana Rose, Sarah Carr, Meerat Kaur & Victoria J. Palmer
P. A. Logan
P. A. Logan
Pam Miller
Pam Miller
Patricio Cuevas-Parra
Patricio Cuevas-Parra
Patrick Vernon
Patrick Vernon
Paul Hine
Paul Hine
Paul Hine
Paul Hine
Paul Hine
Paul Hine
Paul Robson, Alice Sampson, Nnamdi Dime, Louisa Hernandez and Rachael Litherland
Paul Robson, Alice Sampson, Nnamdi Dime, Louisa Hernandez and Rachael Litherland
Paul Wicks
Paul Wicks
Paula Hyde
Paula Hyde
Paula M Watson
Paula M Watson
People's Voice Media
People's Voice Media
Pete Fleischmann
Pete Fleischmann
Peter Beresford
Peter Beresford
Peter Dobers
Peter Dobers
Peter Lewis
Peter Lewis
Peter van der Graaf
Peter van der Graaf
Peter van der Graaf
Peter van der Graaf
Philip Mullen
Philip Mullen
Philippa Davies
Philippa Davies
Phillip Hunter
Phillip Hunter
Pino Frumiento
Pino Frumiento
Pippa Coutts
Pippa Coutts
Public Health Wales
Public Health Wales
Rachael Addicott
Rachael Addicott
Rachael Weston
Rachael Weston
Rachel Matthews
Rachel Matthews
Rachel Pain
Rachel Pain
Rachel Rosen
Rachel Rosen
Rafael Ramírez
Rafael Ramírez
Rebecca Jane-Law
Rebecca Jane-Law
Reni Eddo-Lodge
Reni Eddo-Lodge
Renske Visser
Renske Visser
Rhianne Noor
Rhianne Noor
Richard J. McManus
Richard J. McManus
Richard Pender
Richard Pender
Robert Borst
Robert Borst
Robert Glenn
Robert Glenn
Robert Marten
Robert Marten
Robyn Steward
Robyn Steward
Rolf Hvidtfeldt
Rolf Hvidtfeldt
Roman Kislov
Roman Kislov
Roman Kislov
Roman Kislov
Rosamund Snow
Rosamund Snow
Rosemary Davies
Rosemary Davies
Rosemary J Hollick
Rosemary J Hollick
Rosie Davies
Rosie Davies
Rosie McLeod
Rosie McLeod
Ruth Dineen
Ruth Dineen
Ryan Hunter
Ryan Hunter
Sadaf Shallwani
Sadaf Shallwani
Saffron Woodcraft
Saffron Woodcraft
Samira Musse
Samira Musse
Sandy Oliver
Sandy Oliver
Sarah Burns
Sarah Burns
Sarah Carr
Sarah Carr
Sarah Ewans
Sarah Ewans
Sarah Smith
Sarah Smith
Sebastian Jilke
Sebastian Jilke
Shahid Islam
Shahid Islam
Shama Mohammed
Shama Mohammed
Sharp, L. K.
Sharp, L. K.
Sherry Clark
Sherry Clark
Shoba Dawson
Shoba Dawson
Silvia Petretti
Silvia Petretti
Simon Denegri
Simon Denegri
Simone Louise Sherriff, Hilary Miller, Allison Tong, Anna Williamson, Sumithra Muthayya, Sally Redman, Sandra Bailey, Sandra Eades, and Abby Haynes
Simone Louise Sherriff, Hilary Miller, Allison Tong, Anna Williamson, Sumithra Muthayya, Sally Redman, Sandra Bailey, Sandra Eades, and Abby Haynes
Siobhan Morris
Siobhan Morris
Social Care Institute for Excellence
Social Care Institute for Excellence
Sophia Parveen
Sophia Parveen
Sophie Duncan
Sophie Duncan
Sophie Staniszewska
Sophie Staniszewska
Spanjol J
Spanjol J
Stacey Knox
Stacey Knox
Stan (Constantina) Papoulias
Stan (Constantina) Papoulias
Stefan Thomas
Stefan Thomas
Stephen Timmons
Stephen Timmons
Steve Gillard
Steve Gillard
Sue Godt
Sue Godt
Sue Wheatcroft
Sue Wheatcroft
Taco Brandsen
Taco Brandsen
Tamara L. McCarron, Thomas Noseworthy, Karen Moffat, Gloria Wilkinson, Sandra Zelinsky, Deborah White, Derek Hassay, Diane L. Lorenzetti, Nancy J. Marlett
Tamara L. McCarron, Thomas Noseworthy, Karen Moffat, Gloria Wilkinson, Sandra Zelinsky, Deborah White, Derek Hassay, Diane L. Lorenzetti, Nancy J. Marlett
Tanvi Rai
Tanvi Rai
Tessa Richards
Tessa Richards
Thomas Abrams
Thomas Abrams
Tobias Jung
Tobias Jung
Tom Clarke
Tom Clarke
Tony Bovaird
Tony Bovaird
Transforming Adult Social Care Co-production Group
Transforming Adult Social Care Co-production Group
Trevor Noah
Trevor Noah
Trui Steen
Trui Steen
UCLH Maternity Services
UCLH Maternity Services
Unknown
Unknown
Valerie Morrison
Valerie Morrison
Vanessa Bennett
Vanessa Bennett
Vanessa Burholt
Vanessa Burholt
Vasiliki Papageorgiou
Vasiliki Papageorgiou
Vicky Okine
Vicky Okine
Vicky O’Donoghue
Vicky O’Donoghue
Victor Bekkers
Victor Bekkers
Victoria Jane Palmer, Wayne Weavell, Rosemary Callander, Donella Piper, Lauralie Richard, Lynne Maher, Hilary Boyd, Helen Herrman, John Furler, Jane Gunn, Rick Iedema, Glenn Robert
Victoria Jane Palmer, Wayne Weavell, Rosemary Callander, Donella Piper, Lauralie Richard, Lynne Maher, Hilary Boyd, Helen Herrman, John Furler, Jane Gunn, Rick Iedema, Glenn Robert
Watson-Manheim M. B.
Watson-Manheim M. B.
Wezi Thamm
Wezi Thamm
William Voorberg
William Voorberg
Xiao, Y.
Xiao, Y.
Yasminah Beebeejaun, Catherine Durose, James Rees, Jo Richardson and Liz Richardson
Yasminah Beebeejaun, Catherine Durose, James Rees, Jo Richardson and Liz Richardson
Zac Oyama
Zac Oyama
Zahra Kosar
Zahra Kosar
No items found.

XX resources available

Filter resources

Sorry, we couldn't find any resources matching that criteria. Try clearing some of the filters.

View resource

Service user experiences of participating in a Recovery and Collaborative Care Planning Café framed with CHIME: ‘A co-produced narrative paper’

Arrow right

Service user experiences of participating in a Recovery and Collaborative Care Planning Café framed with CHIME: ‘A co-produced narrative paper’

Arrow right
Description:

This paper builds on a previous article on an innovative approach to improve services by collaborating with service users and practitioners. It focuses on investigating the impact of this approach by including the perspectives of service users as collaborators and co-authors.

Author(s):
[[Authors will load here using Finsweet CMS Nest attribute]]
Published:
2023
Resource type:
Download
Added:
July 28, 2023
View resource

Co-creation, co-design, co-production for public health – a perspective on definitions and distinctions

Arrow right

Co-creation, co-design, co-production for public health – a perspective on definitions and distinctions

Arrow right
Description:

The terms co-creation, co-design, and co-production are often used interchangeably when describing initiatives involving multiple stakeholders. Although they share similarities, there are important differences, especially in the context of public health, regarding the roles and level of engagement of stakeholders and when they are involved. this article summarizes these similarities and differences by drawing from various fields such as public administration, governance, service management, design, marketing, and public health.

Author(s):
[[Authors will load here using Finsweet CMS Nest attribute]]
Published:
2022
Resource type:
Download
Added:
June 19, 2023
Research
Services
View resource

Co-producing a physical activity intervention with and for people with severe mental ill health – the spaces story

Arrow right

Co-producing a physical activity intervention with and for people with severe mental ill health – the spaces story

Arrow right
Description:

SPACES (Supporting Physical Activity through Co-production in people with Severe Mental Illness) is a study which aims to develop an intervention to increase physical activity created with and for people with severe mental ill health. The SPACES team employed a comprehensive process of Patient and Public Involvement and Engagement (PPIE) work embedded within a co-production strategy. The article describes the co-production model it uses, the benefits, challenges, achievements and areas for learning and improvement.

Author(s):
[[Authors will load here using Finsweet CMS Nest attribute]]
Published:
2022
Resource type:
Download
Added:
June 19, 2023
Research
Services
View resource

Expectations versus reality: the sustainability of co-production approaches over time

Arrow right

Expectations versus reality: the sustainability of co-production approaches over time

Arrow right
Description:

This study examines the collaboration between practitioners and service users in two programs over time, identifying the factors that contribute to or hinder the long-term sustainability of co-production. There is no single approach that guarantees sustainable co-production; it depends on the specific service and its operating environment. Sustainable co-production relies on four key elements: structure, skills, resources, and mutual commitment. The structure should effectively utilize available resources and skills to foster the ongoing commitment of both service users and professionals to continue collaborating.

Author(s):
[[Authors will load here using Finsweet CMS Nest attribute]]
Published:
2023
Resource type:
Download
Added:
June 19, 2023
Research
Services
View resource

Co-Producing and Co-Designing

Arrow right

Co-Producing and Co-Designing

Arrow right
Description:

The document explores the origins of co-production and co-design, their application in healthcare, and the challenges they bring. It also highlights the implications for healthcare practice and future research.

Author(s):
[[Authors will load here using Finsweet CMS Nest attribute]]
Published:
2022
Resource type:
Link
Added:
June 19, 2023
Services
Research
View resource

Participatory research in and against time

Arrow right

Participatory research in and against time

Arrow right
Description:

This article talks about the differences between how people experience time in their everyday lives and the ways that researchers and theorists think about involving people in research. It focuses on studying children who migrate alone and how their experiences with immigration and welfare systems often involve conflicting and sometimes unfair ways of dealing with time.

Author(s):
[[Authors will load here using Finsweet CMS Nest attribute]]
Published:
2021
Resource type:
Download
Added:
June 19, 2023
Research
Services
View resource

Participatory Visions: Redesigning research for social justice

Arrow right

Participatory Visions: Redesigning research for social justice

Arrow right
Description:

Despite increasing support within universities and amongst research funders for participatory research approaches, institutional processes and funding requirements continue to limit participatory engagements that meaningfully further social justice. Recognising this disconnect, UCL’s Institute for Global Prosperity, Co-Production Collective, and Institute of Education, supported by UCL’s Grand Challenge of Justice & Equality, set out to investigate the practical barriers university researchers and community partners face in conducting participatory social justice research.

Author(s):
[[Authors will load here using Finsweet CMS Nest attribute]]
Published:
2022
Resource type:
Link
Added:
April 26, 2023
Research
View resource

“We know that our voices are valued, and that people are actually going to listen”: co-producing an evaluation of a young people’s research advisory group

Arrow right

“We know that our voices are valued, and that people are actually going to listen”: co-producing an evaluation of a young people’s research advisory group

Arrow right
Description:

Children and young people’s involvement is an increasing priority in UK healthcare and in heath research, alongside recognition that involving children and young people in research requires different considerations to involving adults. Underpinned by children’s rights and a co-production ethos this paper, co-authored with young evaluators, explores the learning from a co-produced evaluation of eyeYPAG, a young persons’ research advisory group (YPAG) for eye and vision research based at Moorfields Eye Hospital, London, UK.

Author(s):
[[Authors will load here using Finsweet CMS Nest attribute]]
Published:
2023
Resource type:
Link
Added:
March 23, 2023
Research
Services
View resource

Multi-stakeholder perspectives on co-production: Five key recommendations following the Liverpool Co-PARS project

Arrow right

Multi-stakeholder perspectives on co-production: Five key recommendations following the Liverpool Co-PARS project

Arrow right
Description:

The Liverpool Co-PARS project was a four-year iterative process in which a physical activity referral scheme for inactive patients with health conditions was developed, refined, and evaluated. The aim of the present study was to explore multidisciplinary stakeholder perspectives of those involved in the co-production of Co-PARS and inform recommendations for future co-production research.

Author(s):
[[Authors will load here using Finsweet CMS Nest attribute]]
Published:
2022
Resource type:
Link
Added:
January 27, 2023
Research
Services
View resource

Co-production as praxis: Critique and engagement from within the university

Arrow right

Co-production as praxis: Critique and engagement from within the university

Arrow right
Description:

Paper arguing that co-producing critique from within the university requires designing boundary spaces, intermediating between knowledge claims and balancing between articulated and attributed values for co-production. This gives rise to co-production as an epistemic praxis, not method, characterised by boundary work, epistemic choreography and triple shifting.

Author(s):
[[Authors will load here using Finsweet CMS Nest attribute]]
Published:
2022
Resource type:
Link
Added:
January 27, 2023
Policy
Research
View resource

The Midwifery Unit Self-Assessment (MUSA) Toolkit: embedding stakeholder engagement and co-production of improvement plans in European midwifery units

Arrow right

The Midwifery Unit Self-Assessment (MUSA) Toolkit: embedding stakeholder engagement and co-production of improvement plans in European midwifery units

Arrow right
Description:

A rapid participatory appraisal was conducted with midwives and stakeholders from European Midwifery Units to explore the clarity and usability of the Midwifery Unit Self-Assessment (MUSA) Tool, to understand how it helps MUs identifying areas for further improvement, and to identify the degree of support maternity services need in this process.

Author(s):
[[Authors will load here using Finsweet CMS Nest attribute]]
Published:
2022
Resource type:
Link
Added:
January 27, 2023
Policy
Services
View resource

Approaches to co-production of research in care homes: a scoping review

Arrow right

Approaches to co-production of research in care homes: a scoping review

Arrow right
Description:

This scoping review aims to map co-production approaches used in care homes for older adults in previous research to support the inclusion of residents and care staff as equal collaborators in future studies.

Author(s):
[[Authors will load here using Finsweet CMS Nest attribute]]
Published:
2022
Resource type:
Link
Added:
January 24, 2023
Services
Research
View resource

Exploring the value and role of creative practices in research co-production

Arrow right

Exploring the value and role of creative practices in research co-production

Arrow right
Description:

This special issue editorial explores: How is creativity applied within co-production? How does such creativity influence the incorporation of evidence into policy or practice? What impact(s) or effect(s) does creativity have in these applications? What are the implications of this, and for whom?

Author(s):
[[Authors will load here using Finsweet CMS Nest attribute]]
Published:
2022
Resource type:
Link
Added:
January 24, 2023
Policy
Research
View resource

‘Playing’ with Evidence: combining creative co-design methods with realist evidence synthesis

Arrow right

‘Playing’ with Evidence: combining creative co-design methods with realist evidence synthesis

Arrow right
Description:

This study aimed to understand how to reduce decline in physical function and physical activity in people with long-term conditions, using realist methods integrated with co-design to provide an explanatory account of what works (or does not), for whom and in what circumstances, to generate ideas about service innovation, and provide recommendations for primary care.

Author(s):
[[Authors will load here using Finsweet CMS Nest attribute]]
Published:
2020
Resource type:
Link
Added:
January 24, 2023
Research
Services
View resource

Co-production practice and future research priorities in United Kingdom-funded applied health research

Arrow right

Co-production practice and future research priorities in United Kingdom-funded applied health research

Arrow right
Description:

A scoping review systematically mapping recent literature on co-production in applied health research in the United Kingdom to inform co-production practice and guide future methodological research. It argues for accepting the diversity in approaches to co-production, calls on researchers to be clearer in their reporting of these approaches, and makes suggestions for what researchers should record.

Author(s):
[[Authors will load here using Finsweet CMS Nest attribute]]
Published:
2022
Resource type:
Link
Added:
December 27, 2022
Research
View resource

The meaning of co-production for clinicians: An exploratory case study of Practitioner Trainers in one Recovery College

Arrow right

The meaning of co-production for clinicians: An exploratory case study of Practitioner Trainers in one Recovery College

Arrow right
Description:

This paper explores the meaning of co-production for clinicians based on their experience of co-production in a Recovery College, using thematic analysis of eight semi-structured interviews with clinicians who have co-produced and co-delivered workshops with a Recovery College Peer Trainer.

Author(s):
[[Authors will load here using Finsweet CMS Nest attribute]]
Published:
2018
Resource type:
Link
Added:
December 27, 2022
Services
Research
Policy
View resource

Reflections from the field: Researchers’ experiences of co-production

Arrow right

Reflections from the field: Researchers’ experiences of co-production

Arrow right
Description:

This paper draws on conversations between a group of research associates who worked on a large-scale co-produced research project, Productive Margins: Regulating for Engagement. Through our conversations and subsequent analysis, three themes emerged regarding our experiences working on the project: (1) Working across difference; (2) Engaging with arts practice; and (3) Creating the conditions for co-production.

Author(s):
[[Authors will load here using Finsweet CMS Nest attribute]]
Published:
2020
Resource type:
Link
Added:
December 27, 2022
Research
View resource

The Participatory Zeitgeist: an explanatory theoretical model of change in an era of coproduction and codesign in healthcare improvement

Arrow right

The Participatory Zeitgeist: an explanatory theoretical model of change in an era of coproduction and codesign in healthcare improvement

Arrow right
Description:

This paper introduces Mental Health Experience Co-design (MH ECO), a peer designed and led adapted form of Experience-based Co-design (EBCD) developed in Australia. It identified eight possible mechanisms from an assessment of the activities and outcomes of MH ECO and a review of existing published evaluations.

Source:
The BMJ
Author(s):
[[Authors will load here using Finsweet CMS Nest attribute]]
Published:
2018
Resource type:
Link
Added:
December 27, 2022
Services
Research
Policy
View resource

The challenges of sharing different ways of knowing

Arrow right

The challenges of sharing different ways of knowing

Arrow right
Description:

Editorial about the different ways of knowing, prefacing articles exploring ways of sharing knowledge across language, cultural or disciplinary differences.

Author(s):
[[Authors will load here using Finsweet CMS Nest attribute]]
Published:
2018
Resource type:
Link
Added:
December 27, 2022
Research
View resource

Co-producing accountability? Drawing conclusions from non-profit child care services in Manitoba

Arrow right

Co-producing accountability? Drawing conclusions from non-profit child care services in Manitoba

Arrow right
Description:

Through key informant interviews with parents, non-profit organizations and government officials, this article argues that accountability is not co-produced because citizen co-producers are overly burdened with a disproportionate share of risk and responsibility compared to government co-producers with minimal support.

Author(s):
[[Authors will load here using Finsweet CMS Nest attribute]]
Published:
2018
Resource type:
Link
Added:
December 26, 2022
Services
Policy
View resource

Co-producing Randomized Controlled Trials: How Do We Work Together?

Arrow right

Co-producing Randomized Controlled Trials: How Do We Work Together?

Arrow right
Description:

Paper discusses co-production in quantitative research (with a specific focus on randomized controlled trials), how it can work in practice, and the barriers and enablers of co-production. It focuses on a randomized controlled trial of a peer support intervention in mental health which explicitly set out to coproduce knowledge and employed service user researchers.

Author(s):
[[Authors will load here using Finsweet CMS Nest attribute]]
Published:
2019
Resource type:
Link
Added:
December 26, 2022
Services
Research
Policy
View resource

Financial Rewards Do Not Stimulate Coproduction: Evidence from Two Experiments

Arrow right

Financial Rewards Do Not Stimulate Coproduction: Evidence from Two Experiments

Arrow right
Description:

Study of a set of experiments that offered subjects a financial incentive to assist municipalities in helping refugees integrate. The experiment was first conducted among university students within a laboratory setting. Then, the initial findings were replicated and extended among a general adult sample. Results suggest that small financial rewards have no effect.

Author(s):
[[Authors will load here using Finsweet CMS Nest attribute]]
Published:
2018
Resource type:
Link
Added:
December 26, 2022
Services
Research
Policy
View resource

Co-creative approaches to knowledge production: what next for bridging the research to practice gap?

Arrow right

Co-creative approaches to knowledge production: what next for bridging the research to practice gap?

Arrow right
Description:

This special issue arises from an international pursuit funded by the US National Science Foundation through SESYNC (the National Socio-Environmental Synthesis Center) to further explore the contribution of co-creation to support the use of evidence in policy and practice change.

Author(s):
[[Authors will load here using Finsweet CMS Nest attribute]]
Published:
2019
Resource type:
Link
Added:
December 24, 2022
Research
Services
Policy
View resource

Building trust and sharing power for co-creation in Aboriginal health research: a stakeholder interview study

Arrow right

Building trust and sharing power for co-creation in Aboriginal health research: a stakeholder interview study

Arrow right
Description:

This study describes the critical success factors behind SEARCH, focusing on how Study of Environment on Aboriginal Resilience and Child Health (SEARCH) was established, and continues to build trusting co-creative relationships. It also explores some continuing challenges and considers how the partnership might be strengthened.

Author(s):
[[Authors will load here using Finsweet CMS Nest attribute]]
Published:
2019
Resource type:
Link
Added:
December 24, 2022
Research
Services
Policy
View resource

Generating ‘good enough’ evidence for co-production

Arrow right

Generating ‘good enough’ evidence for co-production

Arrow right
Description:

The article focuses on the co-production of public services, offering theory-based and knowledge-based routes to evidencing co-production. It cites a range of ‘good enough’ methodologies which community organisations and small-scale service providers experimenting with co-production can use to assess the potential contribution, including appreciative inquiry, peer-to-peer learning and data sharing.

Author(s):
[[Authors will load here using Finsweet CMS Nest attribute]]
Published:
2017
Resource type:
Link
Added:
December 24, 2022
Research
Policy
Services
View resource

Lost in the shadows: reflections on the dark side of co-production

Arrow right

Lost in the shadows: reflections on the dark side of co-production

Arrow right
Description:

This article is a response to ‘The dark side of coproduction: do the costs outweigh the benefits for health research?’ recently published in Health Research Policy and Systems (2019, 17:33). The original commentary raises some important questions about how and when to co-produce health research, including highlighting various professional costs to those involved. However, we identify four related limitations in their inquiry.

Author(s):
[[Authors will load here using Finsweet CMS Nest attribute]]
Published:
2020
Resource type:
Link
Added:
December 24, 2022
Research
Services
Policy
View resource

Understanding the motivations of patients: A co-designed project to understand the factors behind patient engagement

Arrow right

Understanding the motivations of patients: A co-designed project to understand the factors behind patient engagement

Arrow right
Description:

The results of this research describe a sample of patient and family members currently engaged with health systems. We identified seven motivational factors underlying their engagement.

Author(s):
[[Authors will load here using Finsweet CMS Nest attribute]]
Published:
2019
Resource type:
Link
Added:
December 24, 2022
Services
View resource

Designing and developing a co-produced theoretical and evidence-based online support for family caregivers of people with dementia at the end of life

Arrow right

Designing and developing a co-produced theoretical and evidence-based online support for family caregivers of people with dementia at the end of life

Arrow right
Description:

This paper reports the development and presents the targets (subject areas) and components of a prototype website to support family caregivers of a person with dementia towards the end of life.

Author(s):
[[Authors will load here using Finsweet CMS Nest attribute]]
Published:
2019
Resource type:
Link
Added:
December 24, 2022
Services
View resource

Drawing straight lines along blurred boundaries: qualitative research, patient and public involvement in medical research, co-production and co-design

Arrow right

Drawing straight lines along blurred boundaries: qualitative research, patient and public involvement in medical research, co-production and co-design

Arrow right
Description:

There has also been a subtle shift in the discourse, with the language of co-design and co-production used more widely in debates about involvement. This shift has surfaced once again debates about what counts as meaningful involvement. In this paper we seek to contribute to this debate by exploring boundaries and overlaps between them.

Author(s):
[[Authors will load here using Finsweet CMS Nest attribute]]
Published:
2019
Resource type:
Link
Added:
December 24, 2022
Research
View resource

Bringing together co-production and community participatory research approaches

Arrow right

Bringing together co-production and community participatory research approaches

Arrow right
Description:

Using first person reflective narrative, this paper explores how community participatory approaches enable barriers to co-production to be overcome in a primary mental health service.

Author(s):
[[Authors will load here using Finsweet CMS Nest attribute]]
Published:
2019
Resource type:
Download
Added:
December 24, 2022
Research
Services
View resource

Toward Co-productive Learning? The Exchange Network as Experimental Space

Arrow right

Toward Co-productive Learning? The Exchange Network as Experimental Space

Arrow right
Description:

In this paper the development of the Exchange Network is presented, an experimental learning space deliberately designed to foreground, and work on this relational dynamic in healthcare research and quality improvement.

Author(s):
[[Authors will load here using Finsweet CMS Nest attribute]]
Published:
2019
Resource type:
Link
Added:
December 24, 2022
Research
Services
Policy
View resource

Child-Led Research: Questioning Knowledge

Arrow right

Child-Led Research: Questioning Knowledge

Arrow right
Description:

This article draws upon an empirical study of ‘child-led research’ projects, undertaken in Bangladesh, Jordan and Lebanon, for a critical examination of the meanings and implications of ‘child-led research’. In particular, this paper explores what counts as knowledge in social science research within contexts of generational difference and power.

Author(s):
[[Authors will load here using Finsweet CMS Nest attribute]]
Published:
2019
Resource type:
Link
Added:
December 24, 2022
Research
View resource

Crossing the great divide: Coproduction, synergy, and development

Arrow right

Crossing the great divide: Coproduction, synergy, and development

Arrow right
Description:

Two cases are presented — one from Brazil and one from Nigeria. The third section of the paper provides a brief overview of the theory of coproduction and its relevance for understanding the two cases. The last section addresses the implications of coproduction in polycentric systems for synergy and development.

Author(s):
[[Authors will load here using Finsweet CMS Nest attribute]]
Published:
1996
Resource type:
Link
Added:
December 24, 2022
Services
Research
Policy
View resource

Realising the Potential of Co-production: Negotiating Improvements in Public Services

Arrow right

Realising the Potential of Co-production: Negotiating Improvements in Public Services

Arrow right
Description:

This article looks at the purported advantages of co-production, and considers how these can best be accessed. A case study workshop involving social housing users and providers, conducted as part of the National Consumer Council-Unison Shared Solutions project, is used to illustrate the need for collective dialogue and deliberation between co-producers rather than purely transactional forms of co-production.

Author(s):
[[Authors will load here using Finsweet CMS Nest attribute]]
Published:
2008
Resource type:
Link
Added:
December 24, 2022
Research
View resource

Distinguishing Different Types of Coproduction: A Conceptual Analysis Based on the Classical Definitions

Arrow right

Distinguishing Different Types of Coproduction: A Conceptual Analysis Based on the Classical Definitions

Arrow right
Description:

This article argues that rather than trying to determine one encompassing definition of the concept, several different types of coproduction can be distinguished. Recognizing different types of coproduction more systematically is a critical step in making research on this phenomenon more comparable and more cumulative.

Author(s):
[[Authors will load here using Finsweet CMS Nest attribute]]
Published:
2015
Resource type:
Link
Added:
December 24, 2022
Research
Policy
Services
View resource

Value co-production: intellectual origins and implications for practice and research

Arrow right

Value co-production: intellectual origins and implications for practice and research

Arrow right
Description:

This paper surveys the history of an alternative view of value creation to that associated with industrial production. It argues that technical breakthroughs and social innovations in actual value creation render the alternative—a value co-production framework—ever more pertinent.

Author(s):
[[Authors will load here using Finsweet CMS Nest attribute]]
Published:
1999
Resource type:
Link
Added:
December 24, 2022
Services
Research
Policy
View resource

Co-producing public involvement training with members of the public and research organisations in the East Midlands

Arrow right

Co-producing public involvement training with members of the public and research organisations in the East Midlands

Arrow right
Description:

This paper reports on setting up a training programme for lay assessors. It describes a way of working that embodies a regional, cross-organisational approach to co-producing training with members of the public.

Author(s):
[[Authors will load here using Finsweet CMS Nest attribute]]
Published:
2017
Resource type:
Link
Added:
December 23, 2022
Services
Research
Policy
View resource

Co-production: towards a utopian approach

Arrow right

Co-production: towards a utopian approach

Arrow right
Description:

This article outlines how co-production might be understood as a utopian method, which both attends to and works against dominant inequalities. It suggests that it might be positioned ‘within, against, and beyond’ current configurations of power in academia and society more broadly. It develops this argument by drawing on recent research funded through the UK’s Connected Communities programme.

Author(s):
[[Authors will load here using Finsweet CMS Nest attribute]]
Published:
2017
Resource type:
Link
Added:
December 23, 2022
Research
Services
Policy
View resource

Framework, principles and recommendations for utilising participatory methodologies in the co-creation and evaluation of public health interventions

Arrow right

Framework, principles and recommendations for utilising participatory methodologies in the co-creation and evaluation of public health interventions

Arrow right
Description:

The aim of this study was to identify a key set of principles and recommendations for co-creating public health interventions. These recommendations aim to help the co-creation of public health interventions by providing a framework and governance to guide the process.

Author(s):
[[Authors will load here using Finsweet CMS Nest attribute]]
Published:
2019
Resource type:
Link
Added:
December 23, 2022
Services
Policy
Research
View resource

Public Participation in Health and Social Care: Exploring the Co-production of Knowledge

Arrow right

Public Participation in Health and Social Care: Exploring the Co-production of Knowledge

Arrow right
Description:

An essential first step to advancing public participation in health is to put it in the context of developing modern democracy more generally. This article seeks to do this by identifying four key stages in the development of public participation in health and social care.

Author(s):
[[Authors will load here using Finsweet CMS Nest attribute]]
Published:
2019
Resource type:
Link
Added:
December 23, 2022
Research
View resource

The challenge of inclusive coproduction: The importance of situated rituals and emotional inclusivity in the coproduction of health research projects

Arrow right

The challenge of inclusive coproduction: The importance of situated rituals and emotional inclusivity in the coproduction of health research projects

Arrow right
Description:

Using ethnographic data with four applied health research projects, we explored how everyday rituals generate and sustain inclusivity. Informed by interactional ritual change theory, we identify two types of interlinked inclusivity: relational, individuals routinely engaging together; and emotional, the feeling of being included.

Author(s):
[[Authors will load here using Finsweet CMS Nest attribute]]
Published:
2018
Resource type:
Link
Added:
December 22, 2022
Research
Policy
Services
View resource

Welsh Network for Coproduction: Research Papers

Arrow right

Welsh Network for Coproduction: Research Papers

Arrow right
Description:

Selection of academic papers from the the co-production knowledge base of the Welsh Network for Co-production.

Author(s):
[[Authors will load here using Finsweet CMS Nest attribute]]
Published:
2018
Resource type:
Link
Added:
December 22, 2022
Research
View resource

Joint Decision Making: A systematic review

Arrow right

Joint Decision Making: A systematic review

Arrow right
Description:

This briefing is based on a systematic review of joint decision-making. Joint decision-making initiatives can increase wellbeing in a number of ways, when looking at interventions such as community involvement in urban renewal projects, co-production in public services and participatory budgeting.

Author(s):
[[Authors will load here using Finsweet CMS Nest attribute]]
Published:
2018
Resource type:
Link
Added:
December 22, 2022
Services
Policy
Research
View resource

Analysing co-creation in theory and in practice: A systemic review

Arrow right

Analysing co-creation in theory and in practice: A systemic review

Arrow right
Description:

Stakeholders across the public sector, industry, academia and civil society expect demonstrable impacts and to be engaged in the co-creation and coproduction of socially robust knowledge. This Working Paper explores the question: ‘What is research impact in the humanities and social sciences (SSH) and how might we measure, accelerate and stimulate it?’

Author(s):
[[Authors will load here using Finsweet CMS Nest attribute]]
Published:
2017
Resource type:
Download
Added:
December 22, 2022
Research
View resource

Co-creation in Social Sciences and Humanities: Experiences, Considerations, Lessons Learned

Arrow right

Co-creation in Social Sciences and Humanities: Experiences, Considerations, Lessons Learned

Arrow right
Description:

This report is part of Work Package 2 in the ACCOMPLISSH project. It includes the results and conclusions from 14 focus group interviews with quadruple helix partners in 12 countries. Having considered, planned and worked with quadruple helix collaboration and co-creation in the fields of Social Sciences and the Humanities (SSH), the authors of the report can come with the following recommendations.

Author(s):
[[Authors will load here using Finsweet CMS Nest attribute]]
Published:
2017
Resource type:
Download
Added:
December 22, 2022
Research
View resource

Principles for promoting the impact of SSH research by co-creation: key issues in research design and communication

Arrow right

Principles for promoting the impact of SSH research by co-creation: key issues in research design and communication

Arrow right
Description:

This working paper draws on the experiences and knowledge of the participants of the ACCOMPLISSH dialogue platform and represents a consolidation of our shared learning so far, just over one year on. It contains examples of practice across Europe and aims to assist Universities in strategic planning and the practical steps they need to take to create the conditions that can encourage societal impact via co-creation.

Author(s):
[[Authors will load here using Finsweet CMS Nest attribute]]
Published:
2018
Resource type:
Link
Added:
December 22, 2022
Research
View resource

The Challenge of Co-Production: Report by Nesta

Arrow right

The Challenge of Co-Production: Report by Nesta

Arrow right
Description:

This paper explores the meaning of co-production and the benefits it can bring to public services. The paper also diagnoses why public service reform is stalled, and why a radically new approach - sharing the design and delivery of services with users - can break this logjam and make services more effective for the public, more cost-effective for policymakers, and more sustainable for all of us.

Author(s):
[[Authors will load here using Finsweet CMS Nest attribute]]
Published:
2013
Resource type:
Link
Added:
December 22, 2022
Services
Policy
Research
View resource

A co-produced method to involve service users in research: the SUCCESS model

Arrow right

A co-produced method to involve service users in research: the SUCCESS model

Arrow right
Description:

Although co-production is recommended when involving people in research, methods for involving people are usually designed and managed by researchers and there is little evidence about methods to co-produce models for effective public and patient involvement. We report the method used by a group of patient and carer service users to develop and implement a model for involving public members in research.

Author(s):
[[Authors will load here using Finsweet CMS Nest attribute]]
Published:
2019
Resource type:
Link
Added:
December 22, 2022
Research
View resource

Coproduction and partnership with people and communities

Arrow right

Coproduction and partnership with people and communities

Arrow right
Description:

Coproduction with people and communities needs to be part of a radical change in healthcare leadership and management, away from doing things ‘to’ or even ‘for’ people and towards a new model of leading ‘with’ others, putting people and neighbourhoods at the heart of a new systems leadership, focussing on what really matters.

Source:
The BMJ
Author(s):
[[Authors will load here using Finsweet CMS Nest attribute]]
Published:
2021
Resource type:
Link
Added:
December 22, 2022
Services
Policy
Research
View resource

An annotated and critical glossary of the terminology of inclusion in healthcare and health research

Arrow right

An annotated and critical glossary of the terminology of inclusion in healthcare and health research

Arrow right
Description:

The importance of including members of the public has been accorded a significant position in health planning, service delivery and research. But this position masks a lack of clarity about terms that are used. This paper identifies terms that are in common use in the lexicon of community based involvement and engagement in health with the intention of clarifying meaning and thus reducing ambiguity.

Author(s):
[[Authors will load here using Finsweet CMS Nest attribute]]
Published:
2020
Resource type:
Link
Added:
December 22, 2022
Research
Services
Policy
View resource

Co-production by people outside paid employment

Arrow right

Co-production by people outside paid employment

Arrow right
Description:

This comprehensive research in the UK to investigate how ‘co-production’ captures and develops the vital contribution people outside paid work make to their neighbourhoods. In keeping with the concept of co-production, people outside paid work in each of the local communities received training enabling them to work as researchers on the project.

Author(s):
[[Authors will load here using Finsweet CMS Nest attribute]]
Published:
2006
Resource type:
Link
Added:
December 21, 2022
Services
Policy
View resource

Mobilising knowledge in complex health systems: a call to action

Arrow right

Mobilising knowledge in complex health systems: a call to action

Arrow right
Description:

This paper moves the discussion to a practical level, proposing actions that can be taken to implement evidence successfully in complex systems. Key to success is working with, rather than trying to simplify or control, complexity. The integrated actions relate to co-producing knowledge, establishing shared goals and measures, enabling leadership, ensuring adequate resourcing, contributing to the science of knowledge-to-action, and communicating strategically.

Author(s):
[[Authors will load here using Finsweet CMS Nest attribute]]
Published:
2017
Resource type:
Link
Added:
December 21, 2022
Services
Policy
Research
View resource

The power of symbolic capital in patient and public involvement in health research

Arrow right

The power of symbolic capital in patient and public involvement in health research

Arrow right
Description:

Paper exploring power relations in patient and public involvement (PPI) in research, particularly how patients may wield symbolic capital to develop a more equal relationship.

Author(s):
[[Authors will load here using Finsweet CMS Nest attribute]]
Published:
2016
Resource type:
Link
Added:
December 21, 2022
Research
View resource

Co-Production of Prolonged, Complex, and Negative Services: An Examination of Medication Adherence in Chronically Ill Individuals

Arrow right

Co-Production of Prolonged, Complex, and Negative Services: An Examination of Medication Adherence in Chronically Ill Individuals

Arrow right
Description:

Paper about service coproduction, elucidating the behaviors through which customers strive toward adherence. It integrates services and medical perspectives to develop a novel theoretical framework of adherence as a nested system of coproduction behaviors, characterized by temporal and scope dimensions, utilizing a qualitative approach.

Author(s):
[[Authors will load here using Finsweet CMS Nest attribute]]
Published:
2015
Resource type:
Link
Added:
December 21, 2022
Services
Policy
View resource

Co-production in mental health care

Arrow right

Co-production in mental health care

Arrow right
Description:

Editorial about mental health services in England, arguing that co-production needs to be seen in mental health as part of that long-run debate about what a mental health care system should be like that I discussed in the introduction.

Author(s):
[[Authors will load here using Finsweet CMS Nest attribute]]
Published:
2015
Resource type:
Download
Added:
December 21, 2022
Services
Policy
View resource

Public harm or public value? Towards coproduction in research with communities

Arrow right

Public harm or public value? Towards coproduction in research with communities

Arrow right
Description:

This paper develops a critique of the current model of research governance ethics which casts communities as vulnerable subjects. It uses the insights of coproduction as a way of positively rethinking the relationship between researchers and ‘the researched’ to create new ways of thinking about public value.

Author(s):
[[Authors will load here using Finsweet CMS Nest attribute]]
Published:
2015
Resource type:
Link
Added:
December 19, 2022
Research
View resource

Co-production of knowledge: the future

Arrow right

Co-production of knowledge: the future

Arrow right
Description:

An editorial about new collection highlights the role of co-production in strengthening health systems.

Source:
The BMJ
Author(s):
[[Authors will load here using Finsweet CMS Nest attribute]]
Published:
2021
Resource type:
Link
Added:
December 19, 2022
Research
View resource

Collaborative research and the co-production of knowledge for practice

Arrow right

Collaborative research and the co-production of knowledge for practice

Arrow right
Description:

An illustrative case study examining what the theory of co-production adds to understanding of processes of knowledge creation and translation we observed in one of the Collaborations for Leadership in Applied Health Research and Care.

Author(s):
[[Authors will load here using Finsweet CMS Nest attribute]]
Published:
2015
Resource type:
Link
Added:
December 19, 2022
Research
View resource

Co-producing research: working together or falling apart?

Arrow right

Co-producing research: working together or falling apart?

Arrow right
Description:

This paper summarises a CGAP roundtable discussion held on the 2nd of November 2011 at Cass Business School, London, as part of the 9th ESRC Festival of Social Science. The event brought together academics and third sector practitioners to share their experiences of co-producing research and to consider the benefits and challenges that joint academic-voluntary sector research presents to both sides.

Author(s):
[[Authors will load here using Finsweet CMS Nest attribute]]
Published:
2012
Resource type:
Link
Added:
December 19, 2022
Research
View resource

Participatory Research Methods: A Methodological Approach in Motion

Arrow right

Participatory Research Methods: A Methodological Approach in Motion

Arrow right
Description:

Fundamental principles of participatory research, such as democratic-theory considerations, the concept of "safe space," participation issues, and ethical questions. The article also focuses on practical research considerations regarding the role and tasks of the various participants; specific methodological approaches; and quality criteria—understood here in the sense of arguments justifying a participatory approach.

Author(s):
[[Authors will load here using Finsweet CMS Nest attribute]]
Published:
2012
Resource type:
Link
Added:
December 19, 2022
Research
View resource

How far does an emphasis on stakeholder engagement and co-production in research present a threat to academic identity and autonomy?

Arrow right

How far does an emphasis on stakeholder engagement and co-production in research present a threat to academic identity and autonomy?

Arrow right
Description:

A prospective study across five European countries, (the Netherlands, Spain, Hungary, Germany and the UK), showing how even well-planned engagement activities can be diverted within the existing research funding and research production systems where non-research stakeholders remain at the margins and can even be seen as a threat to academic identify and autonomy.

Author(s):
[[Authors will load here using Finsweet CMS Nest attribute]]
Published:
2021
Resource type:
Link
Added:
December 19, 2022
Research
View resource

Four principles for practising and evaluating co-production – a view from sustainability research

Arrow right

Four principles for practising and evaluating co-production – a view from sustainability research

Arrow right
Description:

Drawing on the expertise of 36 co-production practitioners in the field of sustainability research, the blog article presents a new working definition of co-produced research and suggests how different elements of successfully co-produced knowledge can be understood and evaluated.

Author(s):
[[Authors will load here using Finsweet CMS Nest attribute]]
Published:
2020
Resource type:
Link
Added:
December 16, 2022
Research
View resource

Values and value in patient and public involvement: moving beyond methods

Arrow right

Values and value in patient and public involvement: moving beyond methods

Arrow right
Description:

The authors of this paper outline that Patient and public involvement (PPI) in research has evolved over recent years, yet it often remains an ‘optional extra’ and, in some cases, tokenistic. Discussions are often focused on processes and methods, and are yet to make Patient and public involvement the norm; the authors argue that the conversation needs to change to one of ‘value’: a culture of common values and principles across all types of research.

Author(s):
[[Authors will load here using Finsweet CMS Nest attribute]]
Published:
2022
Resource type:
Link
Added:
December 1, 2022
Research
View resource

Co-producing knowledge in health and social care research: reflections on the challenges and ways to enable more equal relationships

Arrow right

Co-producing knowledge in health and social care research: reflections on the challenges and ways to enable more equal relationships

Arrow right
Description:

The article examines the constraints that exist when trying to share power, informed by multidisciplinary theories of power. To bring co-production principles into practice, changes are needed within research practices, cultures and structures; in understandings of what knowledge is and how different forms of knowledge are valued. The article outlines challenges and tensions when co-producing research and describes potential ideas and resources that may help to put co-production principles into practice.

Author(s):
[[Authors will load here using Finsweet CMS Nest attribute]]
Published:
2021
Resource type:
Link
Added:
November 29, 2022
Research
View resource

Special Issue: Inside Co-production

Arrow right

Special Issue: Inside Co-production

Arrow right
Description:

This special issue derives from a workshop at the Center for British Studies at the University of California, Berkeley in April 2017. The papers form part of a special issue about co-production from the Social Policy & Administration journal.

Author(s):
[[Authors will load here using Finsweet CMS Nest attribute]]
Published:
2019
Resource type:
Link
Added:
November 29, 2022
Research
Policy
Services
View resource

Is Co-production Just Really Good PPI? Making Sense of Patient and Public Involvement and Co-production Networks

Arrow right

Is Co-production Just Really Good PPI? Making Sense of Patient and Public Involvement and Co-production Networks

Arrow right
Description:

The special issue chapter of ‘Inside co-production: Ruling, resistance, and practice' (edited by Bevir et al. in Social Policy & Administration, 2019 - also available in this library) called for a ‘decentring of co-production’ by focusing attention on elite narratives, local traditions and resistance, and meaningful practices. The authors of this paper continue the analysis of these themes by highlighting what they view as important distinctions between co-production and Patient and Public Involvement (PPI) in applied health research.

Author(s):
[[Authors will load here using Finsweet CMS Nest attribute]]
Published:
2020
Resource type:
Link
Added:
November 29, 2022
Research
View resource

Inside co-production: Ruling, resistance, and practice

Arrow right

Inside co-production: Ruling, resistance, and practice

Arrow right
Description:

The articles in the special issue (of which this chapter is part of) offer critical accounts of co-production in a range of policy domains, setting the elite narratives alongside local traditions and practices of resistance. For full chapter list search 'Special Issue: Inside Co-production'.

Author(s):
[[Authors will load here using Finsweet CMS Nest attribute]]
Published:
2018
Resource type:
Link
Added:
November 29, 2022
Research
Policy
View resource

Developing a novel co-produced methodology to understand ‘real-world’ help-seeking in online peer-peer communities by young people experiencing emotional abuse and neglect

Arrow right

Developing a novel co-produced methodology to understand ‘real-world’ help-seeking in online peer-peer communities by young people experiencing emotional abuse and neglect

Arrow right
Description:

This paper explores the development of a novel co-produced methodology to understand ‘real-world’ help-seeking in online peer-peer communities by young people experiencing emotional abuse and neglect.

Author(s):
[[Authors will load here using Finsweet CMS Nest attribute]]
Published:
2022
Resource type:
Link
Added:
November 29, 2022
Research
View resource

Co-production to understand online help-seeking for young people experiencing emotional abuse and neglect: building capabilities, adapting research methodology and evaluating involvement and impact

Arrow right

Co-production to understand online help-seeking for young people experiencing emotional abuse and neglect: building capabilities, adapting research methodology and evaluating involvement and impact

Arrow right
Description:

This co-produced research explored the experiences of young people seeking help for emotional abuse and neglect via an online, peer-peer message board. This practical case study aims to evidence the meaningful role and impacts associated with young co-researchers involvement in sensitive and complex mental health research using a flexible approach to co-production.

Author(s):
[[Authors will load here using Finsweet CMS Nest attribute]]
Published:
2022
Resource type:
Link
Added:
November 29, 2022
Research
Services
View resource

“Staying native”: co-production in mental health services research

Arrow right

“Staying native”: co-production in mental health services research

Arrow right
Description:

The purpose of this paper is to describe an experiment in research co-production in an evaluation of service planning at a London Mental Health NHS Trust. The paper aims to consider whether members of the research team who have themselves been users of mental health services are able to contribute to the research process as “experts by experience”, or if their experiential knowledge is “colonized” within the academic research team.

Author(s):
[[Authors will load here using Finsweet CMS Nest attribute]]
Published:
2010
Resource type:
Link
Added:
November 29, 2022
View resource

Co-production with Autistic Adults: Reflections from the Authentistic Research Collective

Arrow right

Co-production with Autistic Adults: Reflections from the Authentistic Research Collective

Arrow right
Description:

This article explores co-production in relation to autistic people. The authors reflect on the co-production process with autistic adults from the Authentistic Research Collective at University College London (one of the Co-Production Collective pilot projects). The authors reflect upon six elements that are of potential importance for future coproduction projects with autistic adults

Author(s):
[[Authors will load here using Finsweet CMS Nest attribute]]
Published:
2021
Resource type:
Link
Added:
November 29, 2022
Research
Services
View resource

Co-constructing research: A critical literature review

Arrow right

Co-constructing research: A critical literature review

Arrow right
Description:

This literature review was written as part of the project Co-Design: Learning Reflections, part of the Arts and Humanities Research Council’s (AHRC) Connected Communities programme. At the beginning of 2013 the Connected Communities program awarded 10 projects under a funding call designed to encourage “creative, innovate and ethical” ways of conducting research with communities, rather than on communities. This review was written to act as a conversation starter in order to develop a common baseline for shared learning and cross-project discussion.

Author(s):
[[Authors will load here using Finsweet CMS Nest attribute]]
Published:
2016
Resource type:
Link
Added:
November 29, 2022
Research
Services
View resource

The co-production of what? Knowledge, values, and social relations in health care

Arrow right

The co-production of what? Knowledge, values, and social relations in health care

Arrow right
Description:

This paper proposes that co-production can be understood as an exploratory space and a generative process that leads to different, and sometimes unexpected, forms of knowledge, values, and social relations. By opening up this discussion, the authors hope to stimulate future debates on co-production as well as draw out ways of thinking differently about collaboration and participation in health care and research.

Author(s):
[[Authors will load here using Finsweet CMS Nest attribute]]
Published:
2017
Resource type:
Link
Added:
November 29, 2022
Research
Services
View resource

Co-producing the covid-19 response in Germany, Hong Kong, Lebanon, and Pakistan

Arrow right

Co-producing the covid-19 response in Germany, Hong Kong, Lebanon, and Pakistan

Arrow right
Description:

This paper highlights the benefits of co-production during covid-19 and calls for it to be become embedded in policy making

Source:
The BMJ
Author(s):
[[Authors will load here using Finsweet CMS Nest attribute]]
Published:
2021
Resource type:
Link
Added:
November 28, 2022
Research
Policy
Services
View resource

Working together to co-produce better health: The experience of the Collaboration for Leadership in Applied Health Research and Care for Northwest London

Arrow right

Working together to co-produce better health: The experience of the Collaboration for Leadership in Applied Health Research and Care for Northwest London

Arrow right
Description:

This paper explores how social science research and health care improvement practice were linked through a programme designed to broker collaborations between clinicians, academics, and patients to improve health care – the UK National Institute for Health Research Collaboration for Leadership in Applied Health Research and Care for Northwest London. The authors discuss the successes and challenges of the collaboration and make suggestions on how to develop synergistic relationships that facilitate co-production of social science knowledge and its translation into practice.

Source:
Author(s):
[[Authors will load here using Finsweet CMS Nest attribute]]
Published:
2020
Resource type:
Link
Added:
November 28, 2022
Research
Services
View resource

Patients’ roles and rights in research

Arrow right

Patients’ roles and rights in research

Arrow right
Description:

This editorial argues that full partnership with patients is essential to any modern research enterprise

Source:
The BMJ
Author(s):
[[Authors will load here using Finsweet CMS Nest attribute]]
Published:
2018
Resource type:
Link
Added:
November 28, 2022
Research
View resource

Co-production in substance use research

Arrow right

Co-production in substance use research

Arrow right
Description:

The authors present a series of reflections on experiments in co-production, each of which invites us to reflect on our own assumptions, and our own positions, in the shared project of using research to better address the problems that substance use can pose.

Author(s):
[[Authors will load here using Finsweet CMS Nest attribute]]
Published:
2018
Resource type:
Link
Added:
November 28, 2022
Research
Services
View resource

Collaboration with people with lived experience of prison: reflections on researching cancer care in custodial settings

Arrow right

Collaboration with people with lived experience of prison: reflections on researching cancer care in custodial settings

Arrow right
Description:

In this study investigating cancer care in prison, academic researchers collaborated with three Experts by Experience, or lived experience researchers, from Revolving Doors Agency (RDA). This paper aims to encourage others to harness the benefits of co-producing research with people with lived experience of health care in prison, in a safe and genuine way, by offering our reflections on the process.

Author(s):
[[Authors will load here using Finsweet CMS Nest attribute]]
Published:
2021
Resource type:
Link
Added:
November 28, 2022
Research
Services
View resource

Rethinking research processes to strengthen co-production in low and middle income countries

Arrow right

Rethinking research processes to strengthen co-production in low and middle income countries

Arrow right
Description:

Co-production needs to become an integral part of the training and funding of researchers to ensure research meets everyone’s needs, argue the writers of this paper. They go on to outline some of the key challenges facing the sector

Source:
The BMJ
Author(s):
[[Authors will load here using Finsweet CMS Nest attribute]]
Published:
2021
Resource type:
Link
Added:
November 28, 2022
Research
View resource

“A coalition of the willing”: experiences of co-designing an online pain management programme (iSelf-help) for people with persistent pain

Arrow right

“A coalition of the willing”: experiences of co-designing an online pain management programme (iSelf-help) for people with persistent pain

Arrow right
Description:

Participatory approaches to developing health interventions with end-users are recommended to improve uptake and use. This work aimed to explore the experiences of co-designing an online-delivered pain management programme (iSelf-help) for people with persistent pain.

Author(s):
[[Authors will load here using Finsweet CMS Nest attribute]]
Published:
2021
Resource type:
Link
Added:
November 28, 2022
Research
Services
View resource

The Palgrave Handbook of Co-Production of Public Services and Outcomes

Arrow right

The Palgrave Handbook of Co-Production of Public Services and Outcomes

Arrow right
Description:

This collection brings together an outstanding range of the world's best scholars in the field of co-production. Focuses on the theoretical and empirical debates around the co-production of public services and outcomes. Highlights the evidence - and the evidence gaps - for the impact on public value of co-commissioning, co-design, co-delivery and co-assessment

Source:
Springer
Author(s):
[[Authors will load here using Finsweet CMS Nest attribute]]
Published:
2021
Resource type:
Link
Added:
November 26, 2022
Research
Services
View resource

Understanding Co-production as a Social Innovation

Arrow right

Understanding Co-production as a Social Innovation

Arrow right
Description:

This contribution presents firstly some key findings from social innovation research in the field of public services, showing, by which recurring innovative features ‘co-productive’ service designs make a difference.

Source:
Springer
Author(s):
[[Authors will load here using Finsweet CMS Nest attribute]]
Published:
2020
Resource type:
Link
Added:
November 26, 2022
Research
Services
View resource

Six modes of co-production for sustainability

Arrow right

Six modes of co-production for sustainability

Arrow right
Description:

A piece of research that systematically maps the differences in how 32 initiatives from 6 continents co-produce diverse outcomes for the sustainable development of ecosystems at local to global scales

Source:
Nature
Author(s):
[[Authors will load here using Finsweet CMS Nest attribute]]
Published:
2021
Resource type:
Link
Added:
November 26, 2022
Research
View resource

Effective engagement and involvement with community stakeholders in the co-production of global health research

Arrow right

Effective engagement and involvement with community stakeholders in the co-production of global health research

Arrow right
Description:

The authors argue that small changes as well as larger system-wide changes can strengthen citizens’ contribution to knowledge in health research. They state that co-production of research is key to achieving more equal relationships in global health research and to delivering positive benefits to a wide range of stakeholders

Source:
The BMJ
Author(s):
[[Authors will load here using Finsweet CMS Nest attribute]]
Published:
2021
Resource type:
Download
Added:
November 14, 2022
Research
View resource

Strengthening capacities and resource allocation for co-production of health research in low and middle income countries

Arrow right

Strengthening capacities and resource allocation for co-production of health research in low and middle income countries

Arrow right
Description:

Ghana’s universal health insurance scheme provides a good example of co-production of research. This example shows the important role that co-production of health research can have in generating relevant evidence and innovative, context specific solutions for public health and clinical care challenges

Source:
The BMJ
Author(s):
[[Authors will load here using Finsweet CMS Nest attribute]]
Published:
2021
Resource type:
Download
Added:
November 14, 2022
Research
View resource

Knowledge that matters: Realising the potential of co-production

Arrow right

Knowledge that matters: Realising the potential of co-production

Arrow right
Description:

Report about 5 pilot projects conducted by N8 Research

Author(s):
[[Authors will load here using Finsweet CMS Nest attribute]]
Published:
2016
Resource type:
Download
Added:
November 14, 2022
Research