A co-produced method to involve service users in research: the SUCCESS model
Although co-production is recommended when involving people in research, methods for involving people are usually designed and managed by researchers and there is little evidence about methods to co-produce models for effective public and patient involvement. We report the method used by a group of patient and carer service users to develop and implement a model for involving public members in research.
Sorry, we couldn't find any resources matching that criteria. Try clearing some of the filters.
Towards a step change in co-production for climate resilience
Towards a step change in co-production for climate resilience
The chapter records experiences of UKCR researchers whose projects incorporated co-production approaches to improve the usability, accessibility, relevance and credibility of outputs, and engage different groups of people in climate resilience.
Mechanisms for co-designing and co-producing health and social care: a realist synthesis
Mechanisms for co-designing and co-producing health and social care: a realist synthesis
This article looks at the processes of co-design and co-production in the context of health and social care to explore what what makes it possible for everyone to be involved and work together equally.
Welcome to Home?
Welcome to Home?
Over 2 years from 2022 – 2024 the Home? heritage project has collected and curated the lived experiences of displaced people who arrived in the North of England in the last 10 years seeking refuge and security.
Our payment policy
Our payment policy
This payment policy has been co-created by the Co-Production Collective community and is for anyone who co-produces with Co-Production Collective. It sets out who we can offer payment to, in what circumstances; rates and methods of payment; and information about expenses. It also signposts to further resources and support. Please feel free to use this policy in your own work or for ideas but please credit Co-Production Collective if doing so, thanks! First published in 2022, updated in Sept 2024.
The Groundwater Approach: Building a practical understanding of structural racism
The Groundwater Approach: Building a practical understanding of structural racism
In an effort to help leaders, organizers, and organizations stay focused on the structural and cultural roots of racial inequity, the Racial Equity Institute developed the “Groundwater” metaphor and accompanying analytical framework to explain the nature of racism as it currently exists in the United States.
Time to Talk Next Steps Co-Production Evaluation: Key Learning
Time to Talk Next Steps Co-Production Evaluation: Key Learning
Time to Talk Next Steps (TtTNS) has been a three-year (2021 – 2024) rights-based support programme for young people with additional needs aged 16 – 25 in England. As part of the final stages of the programme, NDTi are sharing the learning and reflections on co-producing the programme’s evaluation.
Not Another Co-Production Cookbook
Not Another Co-Production Cookbook
The Not Another Co-Production Cookbook includes recipes for successful co-production as well as tasty meals from the co-production community.
Authentistic: Co-Production with Autistic Adults
Authentistic: Co-Production with Autistic Adults
The Authentistic Research collective came together to tackle both of these issues as they wanted to investigate how psychological therapies can be adapted for autistic people, whilst at the same time exploring the process of co-production. The team compromised autistic and non-autistic members with diverse experiences in psychology, neuroscience, media and mental health, and were recruited via word of mouth and local groups. Their collaboration was co-produced from the beginning, giving the group the safety and freedom to be their ‘authentic’ selves.
Hearing Birdsong: Raising awareness of hearing loss in under-represented groups
Hearing Birdsong: Raising awareness of hearing loss in under-represented groups
The project began with questions around how to improve communication between people with hearing loss and health/social care professionals in North West London. The steering group, with people with hearing loss met regularly to co-design the workshop, so that it was accessible to people with hearing loss. This included having a hearing loop, a palantypist, sound system and rooms with good acoustics. This workshop brought together people with hearing loss, researchers, healthcare professionals and designers to develop novel research ideas
Black and Minoritised Women’s Voices in Maternity Care
Black and Minoritised Women’s Voices in Maternity Care
Maternity Voices Matter are trained maternity service users using a peer-led approach to community research to include the voices of families in co-producing and improving maternity services. Their aims are to listen to service users, give feedback to health professionals, and ensure that service users’ experiences are at the heart of service provision. They worked with NHS partners and a bilingual family support service at Manor Gardens Community Centre to co-produce a participatory research project into black and minoritised and ‘seldom-heard’ women’s experiences of maternity care.
Expanding co-production and growing capabilities through development of a Co-producer Associates Programme
Expanding co-production and growing capabilities through development of a Co-producer Associates Programme
Since we launched as Co-Production Collective in October 2020, our community has gone from strength to strength, supporting more and more organisations to co-produce. Members of our community are involved in this work on an ad-hoc basis as paid co-producers, but as demand has grown, so has the need to build this capacity in a more sustainable way. We decided to test out the approach of creating our own version of an ‘Associate model’, recruiting a group of people from our community to take a bigger and more ongoing role leading and supporting projects.
Co-producing innovation and improved access to hearing checks with autistic children and young people, and/or children and young people with a learning disability
Co-producing innovation and improved access to hearing checks with autistic children and young people, and/or children and young people with a learning disability
Autistic children and young people, and/or children and young people with a learning disability don’t always have access to hearing checks, or the checks are not appropriate to meet their needs. Since April 2021 we have been working with NHS England to provide co-production support for this project to gather views and generate ideas about how to develop more acceptable hearing checks for children and young people with a learning disability and/or who are autistic. We have also supported pilot projects in residential special schools to co-produce a new approach to hearing checks to test ‘what works.’
Handling Complexity in Evidence from systematic reviews and meta-analyses of Public Health Interventions (CEPHI project)
Handling Complexity in Evidence from systematic reviews and meta-analyses of Public Health Interventions (CEPHI project)
This project aimed to investigate how to make research evidence more useful for local decision-making by developing and testing four new methods to understand how evidence relating to child health from one setting might transfer to another setting. It was funded by the National Institute of Health & Care Research (NIHR) and led by the Evidence for Policy and Practice Information and Co-ordinating Centre, EPPI-Centre, at University College London (UCL) in partnership with Co-Production Collective.
SCIE Making events and meetings accessible
SCIE Making events and meetings accessible
This web resource is for anyone who is organising an event and wants to make it accessible. It is a practical handbook to make any event – whatever the size, whoever the participants – inclusive, so that everyone can take part in the way that best suits them.
‘Building bridges’: reflections and recommendations for co-producing health research
‘Building bridges’: reflections and recommendations for co-producing health research
In this article, the authors set out recommendations for co-producing research, emphasizing the importance of creating connections, or "build bridges," between researchers and various communities. The authors share important rules for effective teamwork and suggest the need for more money, support, and adaptability to make sure this collaborative method is ethical and makes a real impact.
World Cafés as a participatory approach to understanding research agendas in primary care with underserved communities: reflections, challenges and lessons learned
World Cafés as a participatory approach to understanding research agendas in primary care with underserved communities: reflections, challenges and lessons learned
People from minoritised ethnic groups can have difficulty getting health care. They may also be left out of health research. There is a need to include a more diverse group of people in health research. World Cafés are an accessible way to listen to people by getting them to talk to each other about different questions and topics.
Co-producing knowledge: Phases, issues and the td-net toolbox
Co-producing knowledge: Phases, issues and the td-net toolbox
This article discusses how knowledge is collaboratively produced in transdisciplinary research, highlighting the structured phases and significant aspects of this process. It also emphasizes the usefulness of the td-net toolbox, a collection of practical tools and methods designed to facilitate effective communication and collaboration among experts from various fields.
Narrative Matters: Hidden LIVE – Adam's story – a mental health theatre production as an example of participatory principles and practices
Narrative Matters: Hidden LIVE – Adam's story – a mental health theatre production as an example of participatory principles and practices
Research ethics when working in partnership with people outside of the University system: A project report
Research ethics when working in partnership with people outside of the University system: A project report
This document represents the outcome of over 50 conversations with internal and external experts, including public contributors, lay editors, public engagement/involvement managers, researchers at all stages of their career, as well as research ethics committees. This report is a snapshot of the experiences of people working in research and involvement.
Working in partnership with people outside of the university system –Guidance for UCL researchers and staff considering ethics and research ethics
Working in partnership with people outside of the university system –Guidance for UCL researchers and staff considering ethics and research ethics
There can be a lack of confidence among researchers about the ethical and safeguarding dimensions of this work – as well as a perceived tension between protecting people from harm and their rights to open participation. We wanted to create some guidance to improve knowledge and confidence about the ethical and safeguarding dimensions of collaborating with those “outside” the formal research system.
Service user experiences of participating in a Recovery and Collaborative Care Planning Café framed with CHIME: ‘A co-produced narrative paper’
Service user experiences of participating in a Recovery and Collaborative Care Planning Café framed with CHIME: ‘A co-produced narrative paper’
This paper builds on a previous article on an innovative approach to improve services by collaborating with service users and practitioners. It focuses on investigating the impact of this approach by including the perspectives of service users as collaborators and co-authors.
The hitchhiker's guide to co-production
The hitchhiker's guide to co-production
This article presents a scheme for understanding different kinds of co-production, and the different tradeoffs they entail. In so doing, they highlight 6 modes of co-production that emerge when particular design choices are made.
Co-creation, co-design, co-production for public health – a perspective on definitions and distinctions
Co-creation, co-design, co-production for public health – a perspective on definitions and distinctions
The terms co-creation, co-design, and co-production are often used interchangeably when describing initiatives involving multiple stakeholders. Although they share similarities, there are important differences, especially in the context of public health, regarding the roles and level of engagement of stakeholders and when they are involved. this article summarizes these similarities and differences by drawing from various fields such as public administration, governance, service management, design, marketing, and public health.
Co-producing a physical activity intervention with and for people with severe mental ill health – the spaces story
Co-producing a physical activity intervention with and for people with severe mental ill health – the spaces story
SPACES (Supporting Physical Activity through Co-production in people with Severe Mental Illness) is a study which aims to develop an intervention to increase physical activity created with and for people with severe mental ill health. The SPACES team employed a comprehensive process of Patient and Public Involvement and Engagement (PPIE) work embedded within a co-production strategy. The article describes the co-production model it uses, the benefits, challenges, achievements and areas for learning and improvement.
Expectations versus reality: the sustainability of co-production approaches over time
Expectations versus reality: the sustainability of co-production approaches over time
This study examines the collaboration between practitioners and service users in two programs over time, identifying the factors that contribute to or hinder the long-term sustainability of co-production. There is no single approach that guarantees sustainable co-production; it depends on the specific service and its operating environment. Sustainable co-production relies on four key elements: structure, skills, resources, and mutual commitment. The structure should effectively utilize available resources and skills to foster the ongoing commitment of both service users and professionals to continue collaborating.
Co-Producing and Co-Designing
Co-Producing and Co-Designing
The document explores the origins of co-production and co-design, their application in healthcare, and the challenges they bring. It also highlights the implications for healthcare practice and future research.
Commissioning for outcomes and co-production
Commissioning for outcomes and co-production
This handbook and practical guide is the result of eight years of collaboration between the New Economics Foundation (NEF) and local authorities. It sets out a model for designing, commissioning and delivering services s that they focus on commissioning for 'outcomes', promote co-production, and promote social value.
Participatory research in and against time
Participatory research in and against time
This article talks about the differences between how people experience time in their everyday lives and the ways that researchers and theorists think about involving people in research. It focuses on studying children who migrate alone and how their experiences with immigration and welfare systems often involve conflicting and sometimes unfair ways of dealing with time.
So I'm Autistic
So I'm Autistic
Written by autistic advocate Sarah O'Brien, this book gives a much-needed introduction into what autism is and removes the myths, stereotypes and stigma that surround it. Sarah provides insights into what to do after diagnosis and how to approach and navigate the process of informing those in your life, from your family and friends to your teachers or manager at work.
What is white privilege?
What is white privilege?
In the wake of the George Floyd killing and the Black Lives Matter protests, and at a time when many people are discussing white privilege, the BBC asked John Amaechi what it means to him. He explains: "there is nothing but benefit to understanding our own privileges, white and otherwise".
Participatory Visions: Redesigning research for social justice
Participatory Visions: Redesigning research for social justice
Despite increasing support within universities and amongst research funders for participatory research approaches, institutional processes and funding requirements continue to limit participatory engagements that meaningfully further social justice. Recognising this disconnect, UCL’s Institute for Global Prosperity, Co-Production Collective, and Institute of Education, supported by UCL’s Grand Challenge of Justice & Equality, set out to investigate the practical barriers university researchers and community partners face in conducting participatory social justice research.
“We know that our voices are valued, and that people are actually going to listen”: co-producing an evaluation of a young people’s research advisory group
“We know that our voices are valued, and that people are actually going to listen”: co-producing an evaluation of a young people’s research advisory group
Children and young people’s involvement is an increasing priority in UK healthcare and in heath research, alongside recognition that involving children and young people in research requires different considerations to involving adults. Underpinned by children’s rights and a co-production ethos this paper, co-authored with young evaluators, explores the learning from a co-produced evaluation of eyeYPAG, a young persons’ research advisory group (YPAG) for eye and vision research based at Moorfields Eye Hospital, London, UK.
How to get started with Co-Production in Social Prescribing
How to get started with Co-Production in Social Prescribing
This document is an introduction for applying co-production in social prescribing settings. It outlines what social prescribing and co-production are, and the philosophies and values of both, and how they complement each other. It looks at some key ingredients to create effective social prescribing through co-production, and suggests a ‘recipe’ which puts them into practice. This document was created through conversations with the National Academy for Social Prescribing Co-Production Group.
A Meeting of Minds: How co-production benefits people, professionals and organisations
A Meeting of Minds: How co-production benefits people, professionals and organisations
Report focusing on the practice of and learning about co-production, as well as the benefits for people, professionals and organisations. It shares ideas, examples, and inspiration from some of the 58 funded partnerships.
The Parable of the Blobs and Squares
The Parable of the Blobs and Squares
An animation, narrated by Brian Blessed which combines humour with honesty without the blame culture. Edgar Cahn’s book No More Throw-Away People relates the parable of the Blobs and Squares to explain the co-production imperative. This video co-produced by Time Banking UK retells the story.
That Co-production Podcast by Research Design Service South East (RDS SE)
That Co-production Podcast by Research Design Service South East (RDS SE)
Research Design Service South East (RDS SE), in partnership with the National Institute for Health and Care Research (NIHR) Centre for Engagement and Dissemination, have launched a podcast series: ‘That Co-production Podcast!’ The intention is to increase the accessibility of discussion, debate and issues related to co-production.
The Case For Co-production Report
The Case For Co-production Report
These innovative examples show the difference that can be made by fully involving patients, service users and local communities in the design and delivery of services, making the case for co-producing health and social services with the people they serve: No Decision About Me Without Me.
A Simple Guide to Co-Production
A Simple Guide to Co-Production
A handy how-to for any service users or survivors thinking about getting involved with their local NHS trust or research organisation, created by a critical theorist and activist collective. Recovery In The Bin is a a user-led group for Mental Health Survivors and Supporters who are fed up with the way co-opted ‘recovery’ is being used to discipline and control those who are trying to find a place in the world.
The SUN Network Co-production and Involvement Best Practice Guidance
The SUN Network Co-production and Involvement Best Practice Guidance
A quick guide on the meaning, differences and benefits of co-production, collaboration, and involvement. Tis strategy that has been co-produced by people with lived experiences of mental health, drug & alcohol challenges, and learning disabilities, carers, service staff, and those that fund services.
Co-production and decolonisation through the lenses of people, power and process
Co-production and decolonisation through the lenses of people, power and process
The presentation by Jacqui Lovell, Survivor Researcher Network Director, at the August Discussion and Support Group meeting, available in video form, together with the slides used. Themes include: definition of co-production, People, power and process in research, and an example of eurocentricity in mental wellbeing and mental ‘health’ research.
Theory of Change: Diagram and Shared Approach to Co-production
Theory of Change: Diagram and Shared Approach to Co-production
Over six months, Making Every Adult Matter worked alongside a group of people with experience of multiple disadvantage to define a shared approach to their work and to agree a theory of change that can help guide activities.
One Day Training Day Outline: Practicing Co-Productive Relationships
One Day Training Day Outline: Practicing Co-Productive Relationships
Reflecting on eighteen years of working and using health services with both patients and staff, this paper outlines how co-productive relationships are different from non co-productive relationships.
Permission to come alongside? The story of Jorge and Yousef
Permission to come alongside? The story of Jorge and Yousef
This paper is the story of how Dr Andrew Perry came to develop co-productive relationships in forensic environments over ten years. This time with a better psychological map, the benefit of hindsight and the illustrations of Jorge and Yousef.
Some ethics of co-productive relationships
Some ethics of co-productive relationships
This document interrogates co-productive relationships using the four principles of the British Psychological Society (BPS) (2018) code of ethics: respect, competence, responsibility and integrity. It concludes that co-productive relationships appear to have different ethical properties from other forms of helping relationships.
Learning guides to the Stronger Together Toolkit
Learning guides to the Stronger Together Toolkit
If you’re using co-production to involve people in the design of services that impact them and their communities, then this Toolkit is for you. There are 3 main elements to the Stronger Together Toolkit, all of which can be accessed here on this webpage.
Co-production: A Time To Shine Toolkit
Co-production: A Time To Shine Toolkit
Toolkit created by the Centre for Loneliness Studies, a research centre based at the University of Sheffield, exploring the co-production of services for older people who are lonely and/or isolated.
Multi-stakeholder perspectives on co-production: Five key recommendations following the Liverpool Co-PARS project
Multi-stakeholder perspectives on co-production: Five key recommendations following the Liverpool Co-PARS project
The Liverpool Co-PARS project was a four-year iterative process in which a physical activity referral scheme for inactive patients with health conditions was developed, refined, and evaluated. The aim of the present study was to explore multidisciplinary stakeholder perspectives of those involved in the co-production of Co-PARS and inform recommendations for future co-production research.
Craft metrics to value co-production
Craft metrics to value co-production
Article assessing whether research is relevant to society, arguing that to see more co-production, we need to revise the dominant metrics accordingly. In essence, metrics to assess co-production must themselves be co-produced.
Why should urbanists care about co-production? Sheffield Urbanism Lecture Series
Why should urbanists care about co-production? Sheffield Urbanism Lecture Series
Video recording of Co-production & the Future of Urban Epistemics, the third Sheffield Urbanism Lecture Series. The Sheffield Urbanism Lecture series is an initiative of the Urban Institute to stimulate dialogue, discussion and understanding of processes of urbanization and urban life.
Co-production as praxis: Critique and engagement from within the university
Co-production as praxis: Critique and engagement from within the university
Paper arguing that co-producing critique from within the university requires designing boundary spaces, intermediating between knowledge claims and balancing between articulated and attributed values for co-production. This gives rise to co-production as an epistemic praxis, not method, characterised by boundary work, epistemic choreography and triple shifting.
The Midwifery Unit Self-Assessment (MUSA) Toolkit: embedding stakeholder engagement and co-production of improvement plans in European midwifery units
The Midwifery Unit Self-Assessment (MUSA) Toolkit: embedding stakeholder engagement and co-production of improvement plans in European midwifery units
A rapid participatory appraisal was conducted with midwives and stakeholders from European Midwifery Units to explore the clarity and usability of the Midwifery Unit Self-Assessment (MUSA) Tool, to understand how it helps MUs identifying areas for further improvement, and to identify the degree of support maternity services need in this process.
Approaches to co-production of research in care homes: a scoping review
Approaches to co-production of research in care homes: a scoping review
This scoping review aims to map co-production approaches used in care homes for older adults in previous research to support the inclusion of residents and care staff as equal collaborators in future studies.
Co-production at a glance
Co-production at a glance
Involve is the UK’s leading public participation charity. On this webpage they provide an overview of co-production values and its definitions.
Navigating participatory research: a visual guide
Navigating participatory research: a visual guide
This visual guide offers you a map of the landscape of participatory research. Instead of a loop or a one-way road, we think about participatory research as a formation of Islands where co-researchers (co-travelers) might be exploring similar or different landscapes (issues and concerns) at the time when we are together on this journey.
Exploring the value and role of creative practices in research co-production
Exploring the value and role of creative practices in research co-production
This special issue editorial explores: How is creativity applied within co-production? How does such creativity influence the incorporation of evidence into policy or practice? What impact(s) or effect(s) does creativity have in these applications? What are the implications of this, and for whom?
‘Playing’ with Evidence: combining creative co-design methods with realist evidence synthesis
‘Playing’ with Evidence: combining creative co-design methods with realist evidence synthesis
This study aimed to understand how to reduce decline in physical function and physical activity in people with long-term conditions, using realist methods integrated with co-design to provide an explanatory account of what works (or does not), for whom and in what circumstances, to generate ideas about service innovation, and provide recommendations for primary care.
Helping measure person-centred care
Helping measure person-centred care
A review of evidence about commonly used approaches and tools used to help measure person-centred care. It summarises broad themes in the literature and is designed for those who want to gain a quick overview of important ideas and frequently used tools.
Impact in Qualitative Research: A reflection on using co-production approaches in mental health research
Impact in Qualitative Research: A reflection on using co-production approaches in mental health research
In this blog, a mixed-methods researcher who specialises in women’s mental health reflects on the process of doing this study and how the co-production approach resulted in a richer and more impactful study.
Co-production: A Future Vision
Co-production: A Future Vision
Presentation slides about how co-production supports the growth of shared space and blurs boundaries.
Care Homes - The Art of the Irresistible
Care Homes - The Art of the Irresistible
Nine vidoes from recordings from an event in Exeter – stories and examples of co-production.
The experience based design approach – Guide and Tools
The experience based design approach – Guide and Tools
Experience-based design using patient and staff experience to design better healthcare services. The first section is a guide which provides an overview of the EBD (experience based design) approach. The second part of the publication contains tools and advice which will help you to put the EBD approach into practice.
Granby Four Streets Community Land Trust
Granby Four Streets Community Land Trust
Website of a Community Land Trust set up by a community. A Community Land Trust (CLT) is a not for profit community-based organisation run by volunteers that delivers housing and other community facilities at permanently affordable levels for local people. There are a number of benefits to setting up and running a CLT. Usually, the stimulus is a desire to create affordable homes that are available to local people who cannot afford open market housing.
Atmos Totnes: A Community-Led Project
Atmos Totnes: A Community-Led Project
Website of a Community Development in Scotland led by community. Atmos is a project that is being led by the Totnes Community Development Society. TCDS is not for profit company based in Totnes, Devon, that seeks to support the community in obtaining land, managing and imaginatively developing it.
Books on co-production
Books on co-production
A list of book recommendation exploring co-production.
How might we think about power?
How might we think about power?
Article for those committed to promoting “people powered health” in our NHS and wider public services, about how might we think about power. Where previously old power models prevailed, in an age of radical connectivity the potential to utilise new power approaches in health and care is exploding.
Resources for Community Circles
Resources for Community Circles
By developing a circle of support around an individual – bringing people together around a person to share ideas about making a positive change in their lives. This change can be anything – from getting out and about more, to starting a new hobby or restarting an old one, or creating opportunities to spend more time with friends or family.
Health as a Social Movement: seminar series write-up
Health as a Social Movement: seminar series write-up
This summary outlines the key findings from seminars across the country, getting up close to how this change is happening on the ground.
Improving Healthcare Through Clinical Research: Online Course
Improving Healthcare Through Clinical Research: Online Course
A free 6-week, in-depth course on how clinical trials work. Very thorough, including how clinical research is regulated in the United Kingdom and internationally.
Story Curation Resources by Our Voices
Story Curation Resources by Our Voices
A range of resources, from tutorial videos to articles, handouts to website links, that are useful for people interested in story curation and supporting others to use their stories to influence decision makers.
Participatory Budgeting
Participatory Budgeting
Description of participatory budgeting with case studies. It is a form of citizen participation in which citizens are involved in the process of deciding how public money is spent. Local people are often given a role in the scrutiny and monitoring of the process following the allocation of budgets.
Guide to service user involvement and co-production
Guide to service user involvement and co-production
This guide is designed to give you the practical tools you need to develop an involvement programme and approach which places your service users at the heart of your organisation. It provides a structured and accessible introduction to involving people with lived experience of criminal justice in your work, including examples of good practice, checklists, top tips and signposting to further information and support.
Why bother involving people in evaluation?
Why bother involving people in evaluation?
This workbook can help you plan why, when and how to involve the people you work with in evaluation.
How to Create a Visual Abstract
How to Create a Visual Abstract
Resource on how to create a visual abstract for the sake of making information accessible.
English for Healthcare: Language Course
English for Healthcare: Language Course
Develop your language and communication skills for a career in healthcare and learn new healthcare vocabulary in English. May be of interest to people working with Refugee Communities - especially those that want to be involved and they need help with language.
Co-production practice and future research priorities in United Kingdom-funded applied health research
Co-production practice and future research priorities in United Kingdom-funded applied health research
A scoping review systematically mapping recent literature on co-production in applied health research in the United Kingdom to inform co-production practice and guide future methodological research. It argues for accepting the diversity in approaches to co-production, calls on researchers to be clearer in their reporting of these approaches, and makes suggestions for what researchers should record.
The meaning of co-production for clinicians: An exploratory case study of Practitioner Trainers in one Recovery College
The meaning of co-production for clinicians: An exploratory case study of Practitioner Trainers in one Recovery College
This paper explores the meaning of co-production for clinicians based on their experience of co-production in a Recovery College, using thematic analysis of eight semi-structured interviews with clinicians who have co-produced and co-delivered workshops with a Recovery College Peer Trainer.
Reflections from the field: Researchers’ experiences of co-production
Reflections from the field: Researchers’ experiences of co-production
This paper draws on conversations between a group of research associates who worked on a large-scale co-produced research project, Productive Margins: Regulating for Engagement. Through our conversations and subsequent analysis, three themes emerged regarding our experiences working on the project: (1) Working across difference; (2) Engaging with arts practice; and (3) Creating the conditions for co-production.
Evaluating Co-production: Connecting human stories to strategy
Evaluating Co-production: Connecting human stories to strategy
The evaluation was co-produced by University of Sheffield evaluators and Co:Create staff, using a range of methods to incorporate the views of stakeholders on the process of co-production.
Kindness, emotions and human relationships: The blind spot in public policy
Kindness, emotions and human relationships: The blind spot in public policy
Report on powerful and sometime surprising examples of where kindness and everyday relationships can effect change and support the wellbeing of individuals and communities. The report is not “stuffed full with policy recommendations, tool kits or calls for ‘compassionate impact assessments’.” But it does contain some powerful and challenging messages for policymakers.
The Participatory Zeitgeist: an explanatory theoretical model of change in an era of coproduction and codesign in healthcare improvement
The Participatory Zeitgeist: an explanatory theoretical model of change in an era of coproduction and codesign in healthcare improvement
This paper introduces Mental Health Experience Co-design (MH ECO), a peer designed and led adapted form of Experience-based Co-design (EBCD) developed in Australia. It identified eight possible mechanisms from an assessment of the activities and outcomes of MH ECO and a review of existing published evaluations.
The challenges of sharing different ways of knowing
The challenges of sharing different ways of knowing
Editorial about the different ways of knowing, prefacing articles exploring ways of sharing knowledge across language, cultural or disciplinary differences.
Co-producing accountability? Drawing conclusions from non-profit child care services in Manitoba
Co-producing accountability? Drawing conclusions from non-profit child care services in Manitoba
Through key informant interviews with parents, non-profit organizations and government officials, this article argues that accountability is not co-produced because citizen co-producers are overly burdened with a disproportionate share of risk and responsibility compared to government co-producers with minimal support.
Co-producing Randomized Controlled Trials: How Do We Work Together?
Co-producing Randomized Controlled Trials: How Do We Work Together?
Paper discusses co-production in quantitative research (with a specific focus on randomized controlled trials), how it can work in practice, and the barriers and enablers of co-production. It focuses on a randomized controlled trial of a peer support intervention in mental health which explicitly set out to coproduce knowledge and employed service user researchers.
Financial Rewards Do Not Stimulate Coproduction: Evidence from Two Experiments
Financial Rewards Do Not Stimulate Coproduction: Evidence from Two Experiments
Study of a set of experiments that offered subjects a financial incentive to assist municipalities in helping refugees integrate. The experiment was first conducted among university students within a laboratory setting. Then, the initial findings were replicated and extended among a general adult sample. Results suggest that small financial rewards have no effect.
Co-creative approaches to knowledge production: what next for bridging the research to practice gap?
Co-creative approaches to knowledge production: what next for bridging the research to practice gap?
This special issue arises from an international pursuit funded by the US National Science Foundation through SESYNC (the National Socio-Environmental Synthesis Center) to further explore the contribution of co-creation to support the use of evidence in policy and practice change.
Building trust and sharing power for co-creation in Aboriginal health research: a stakeholder interview study
Building trust and sharing power for co-creation in Aboriginal health research: a stakeholder interview study
This study describes the critical success factors behind SEARCH, focusing on how Study of Environment on Aboriginal Resilience and Child Health (SEARCH) was established, and continues to build trusting co-creative relationships. It also explores some continuing challenges and considers how the partnership might be strengthened.
Generating ‘good enough’ evidence for co-production
Generating ‘good enough’ evidence for co-production
The article focuses on the co-production of public services, offering theory-based and knowledge-based routes to evidencing co-production. It cites a range of ‘good enough’ methodologies which community organisations and small-scale service providers experimenting with co-production can use to assess the potential contribution, including appreciative inquiry, peer-to-peer learning and data sharing.
Ethical challenges of co-production: Imagine project
Ethical challenges of co-production: Imagine project
This programme is a large-scale collaborative ethnographic study which explores records and representations of community engagement, using the research to imagine how communities might be different and experiment with different forms of community-building.
The Impact of Co-production: From Community Engagement to Social Justice
The Impact of Co-production: From Community Engagement to Social Justice
Bringing together academics, artists, practitioners and ‘community activists’, this book explores the possibilities for, and tensions of, social justice work under the contemporary drive for community-orientated ‘impact’ in the academy.
Lost in the shadows: reflections on the dark side of co-production
Lost in the shadows: reflections on the dark side of co-production
This article is a response to ‘The dark side of coproduction: do the costs outweigh the benefits for health research?’ recently published in Health Research Policy and Systems (2019, 17:33). The original commentary raises some important questions about how and when to co-produce health research, including highlighting various professional costs to those involved. However, we identify four related limitations in their inquiry.
Co-production of Research: Special Issue by Nature
Co-production of Research: Special Issue by Nature
This special issue of Nature looks at the promise and the pitfalls of research coproduction for the societies, stakeholders and scientists now working shoulder to shoulder.
Understanding the motivations of patients: A co-designed project to understand the factors behind patient engagement
Understanding the motivations of patients: A co-designed project to understand the factors behind patient engagement
The results of this research describe a sample of patient and family members currently engaged with health systems. We identified seven motivational factors underlying their engagement.
Designing and developing a co-produced theoretical and evidence-based online support for family caregivers of people with dementia at the end of life
Designing and developing a co-produced theoretical and evidence-based online support for family caregivers of people with dementia at the end of life
This paper reports the development and presents the targets (subject areas) and components of a prototype website to support family caregivers of a person with dementia towards the end of life.
Drawing straight lines along blurred boundaries: qualitative research, patient and public involvement in medical research, co-production and co-design
Drawing straight lines along blurred boundaries: qualitative research, patient and public involvement in medical research, co-production and co-design
There has also been a subtle shift in the discourse, with the language of co-design and co-production used more widely in debates about involvement. This shift has surfaced once again debates about what counts as meaningful involvement. In this paper we seek to contribute to this debate by exploring boundaries and overlaps between them.
Bringing together co-production and community participatory research approaches
Bringing together co-production and community participatory research approaches
Using first person reflective narrative, this paper explores how community participatory approaches enable barriers to co-production to be overcome in a primary mental health service.
Toward Co-productive Learning? The Exchange Network as Experimental Space
Toward Co-productive Learning? The Exchange Network as Experimental Space
In this paper the development of the Exchange Network is presented, an experimental learning space deliberately designed to foreground, and work on this relational dynamic in healthcare research and quality improvement.
Child-Led Research: Questioning Knowledge
Child-Led Research: Questioning Knowledge
This article draws upon an empirical study of ‘child-led research’ projects, undertaken in Bangladesh, Jordan and Lebanon, for a critical examination of the meanings and implications of ‘child-led research’. In particular, this paper explores what counts as knowledge in social science research within contexts of generational difference and power.
Crossing the great divide: Coproduction, synergy, and development
Crossing the great divide: Coproduction, synergy, and development
Two cases are presented — one from Brazil and one from Nigeria. The third section of the paper provides a brief overview of the theory of coproduction and its relevance for understanding the two cases. The last section addresses the implications of coproduction in polycentric systems for synergy and development.
Realising the Potential of Co-production: Negotiating Improvements in Public Services
Realising the Potential of Co-production: Negotiating Improvements in Public Services
This article looks at the purported advantages of co-production, and considers how these can best be accessed. A case study workshop involving social housing users and providers, conducted as part of the National Consumer Council-Unison Shared Solutions project, is used to illustrate the need for collective dialogue and deliberation between co-producers rather than purely transactional forms of co-production.
Can Co-production Really Transform UK Mental Health Services?
Can Co-production Really Transform UK Mental Health Services?
Editorial about whether co-production can work for mental health.